Skip to content
Mississippi State

Mississippi State Bulldogs

SEC·2-0·
Elo
1584#44
SP+
9.4#35
FPI
8.6
AP
NR
Next@ South Carolina · Wk 3Win prob 26%Model +10.1
Talent #20 (804.5)Recruiting class #2334% production returning

Roster · 115 players

FR 52SO 13JR 29SR 21
#PlayerPosClHtWt
1Kamario TaylorQBSO6'4"230
8Jaden RashadaQBJR6'4"195
14Brodie McWhorterQBFR6'2"220
15Parker PuckettQBFR6'0"180
17AJ SwannQBSR6'2"220
5Xavier GaytenRBJR6'0"205
6Kolin WilsonRBFR5'9"190
21J.J. HillRBFR6'0"220
22Brinston WilliamsRBSR6'2"215
24Fluff BothwellRBJR5'10"230
25Cooper CrosbyRBFR6'0"205
0Gracen HarrisWRFR5'11"175
2Marquis JohnsonWRSR5'11"190
3Anthony Evans IIIWRSR5'11"180
7Zion RaginsWRSO5'8"170
9Camden CapehartWRFR5'8"180
10Bull MitchellWRFR5'11"210
11Ayden WilliamsWRSR6'3"205
12Matt MayfieldWRJR6'2"185
13Sanfrisco MageeWRSO6'2"200
16Jayden CrationWRFR6'3"200
19Junior HendersonWRFR6'4"190
22Jayytee TaylorWRFR6'0"195
80Fisher SouthallWRFR6'2"185
81Zion CrumptonWRFR6'1"165
89Jessie Primer IVWRFR6'0"175
4Zayion CottonTEFR6'5"230
18Riley WilliamsTEJR6'5"250
84Adam LandTEFR6'3"230
85Luke HutchinsonTEFR6'3"235
87Sam WestTEJR6'4"250
88Joeseph SkipworthTEFR6'5"225
50LJ PrudhommeOLFR6'3"320
53Dylan SteenOLFR6'5"315
54Blake SteenOLJR6'6"340
55Jakheem Shumpert-PerkinsOLJR6'5"330
56Wesley DavisOLSR6'4"300
58Miles McVayOLJR6'6"335
59Tyler MillerOLFR6'6"335
60Matthew LefeauOLJR6'5"350
62Jamari FreemanOLSR6'4"300
63Mario NashOLFR6'4"305
65Spencer DowlandOLFR6'6"300
66Ja'Elyne MatthewsOLFR6'6"350
70Breyden TurnageOLFR6'7"320
71Saquon MilesOLJR6'5"320
72Canon BooneOLSR6'4"315
73Leon Noil Jr.OLFR6'5"290
74Kison ShepardOLJR6'7"350
75Isaiah DentOLSO6'6"320
76Jayden RossOLFR6'6"330
77TJ LockhartOLSO6'5"350
78DJ ChesterOLJR6'6"315
79Dalton ToothmanOTFR6'5"320
40Gus CordovaDEFR6'4"270
4Amaree WilliamsEDGEJR6'4"240
Shawn GeeEDGESO6'4"240
9Jaray BledsoeDLSR6'4"315
14Dealyn EvansDLSO6'5"310
19Micah NickersonDLFR6'5"260
23Trevion WilliamsDLJR6'4"295
33Douglas Adams IIIDLJR6'3"240
35Kalvin DinkinsDLSR6'2"320
41Tyshun WillisDLFR6'2"260
42DJ ReedDLJR6'4"285
43Will WhitsonDLSR6'5"295
55Colin CoatesDLJR6'2"320
88Tico CrittendonDLFR6'4"310
90Davon YoungDLFR6'3"320
91Lorenz CammonDLJR6'4"260
92Kaleb MorrisDLFR6'4"285
97Jayson JenkinsDLSR6'6"280
99Diesel MoyeDLSR6'5"345
0Fatt ForrestLBSO6'2"235
7Zakari TillmanLBSR6'2"235
10Jalen SmithLBJR6'2"230
11Tyler LockhartLBSO6'2"225
12Ja'Bryis StewartLBJR6'1"215
13LaKendrick JamesLBJR6'2"250
16Derion GulletteLBJR6'3"240
32AJ RiceLBFR6'1"240
44Gav HolmanLBFR6'1"245
45James Heard Jr.LBJR6'2"230
48Chris AddisonLBFR6'3"250
1Kelley JonesCBSR6'4"205
8Kaylib SingletonCBFR6'1"190
17Kyle JohnsonCBFR5'11"185
20Jett JeffersonCBJR6'1"200
24Quentin TaylorCBSO6'0"205
26Jamroc GrimsleyCBSO6'2"200
30Camron BrownCBFR6'1"180
36Terrell Johnson Jr.CBFR6'2"180
37Dre OteyCBFR6'2"160
38Jaylen AntoineCBFR5'11"180
47Sean PleasantDBFR6'2"170
2Isaac SmithSSR6'0"220
3Kendel DolbySSR5'11"195
5Jardin GilbertSSR6'1"195
6Bralan WomackSFR6'1"210
15Marcus WilliamsSSR5'11"200
18Sekou Smith Jr.SFR6'0"180
21Dre RileySJR6'1"185
25Kolby BarrettSFR6'2"210
27Antavious WattsSFR6'0"185
28Tanner JohnsonSSR6'0"185
29Boogie JohnsonSSO6'2"200
31Terrance LoveSJR6'2"210
34Vic SuttonSJR6'3"215
47William WilkinsonPKSO6'2"185
48Hayden ChambersPKFR6'1"185
80Kyle FerriePKSR6'1"205
83Oisin FlynnPKFR6'3"200
88Ethan PulliamPJR6'1"190
39Kallen CosperLSFR6'4"215
46Kyle RushingLSFR6'1"200

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
50.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
13.0
scoring defense
Differential
+37.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
620.5#2
Yards / play
8.4#6
Passing yards / game
322.0#18
Rushing yards / game
298.5#9
First downs / game
31.5#3
3rd down %
52.4%#24
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
29:14#88
Defense
Yards allowed / game
285.0#48
Yards / play allowed
4.4#38
Pass yards allowed / game
209.5#74
Rush yards allowed / game
75.5#23
3rd down % allowed
24.1%#21
Sacks
4#59
Tackles for loss
10#77
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-1#89
Takeaways
0#126
Giveaways
1#21
Penalties / game
7.0#76
Penalty yards / game
69.0#108

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Mississippi State is in year 3 under Jeff Lebby. The way in is 126th at holding the line of scrimmage, and they are 112th at shutting down the ground game.

Mississippi State has played 1 game against a genuinely tough slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected soft spots

  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #126
    projected
  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #112
    projected
  • Offensesacks and tackles for loss
    #104
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
4.36.7
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
2.3
of 9 games
Bowl odds
16%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
48%
vs Auburn
Toughest
6%
vs Ole Miss

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

234567891011
final winstallest bar = 31% chance
Likeliest finish 4-7 (31%)Bowl eligible 16% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBKamario Taylor
+40.1 EPA
WRAnthony Evans III, Marquis Johnson +3
+28.2 EPA
RBXavier Gayten, Kolin Wilson +1
+22.3 EPA
TESam West
+0.1 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +40.10.581/play69 snaps
EPA +14.10.471/play30 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.5997th#5
Def-0.1293rd#10
Explosiveness
Off1.2442nd#80
Def0.9995th#8
Field position
Off75.091st#14
Def75.815th#117
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.0676th#34
Def2.3879th#30
Turnovers
Won 0Lost 1
Margin -1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.5882nd#25
Off · rush
0.6199th#2

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.6199th#2
Def-0.1584th#23
Passing
Off0.5882nd#26
Def-0.0293rd#11

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
4.13#4
2nd-level / open-field
1.58 / 2.08
Power / stuff (off)
75.0% / 9.6%
Havoc — total (def)
14.0%#105
Havoc — front 7 / DB
8.8% / 5.1%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.50
Def-0.06
Pass downs
Off0.86
Def-0.29

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.38#90.78#40.90#19
Defense-0.03#76-0.44#50.14#27

Elo Trajectory

UL MonroeFinal
Elo rating 14781651+173 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.6496th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0364th
  • Offense success rate58%87th
  • Defense success rate allowed30%74th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs62%87th
  • Offense success — passing downs48%85th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs33%79th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs18%80th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.583rd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.177th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.172nd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.794th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards4.192nd
  • Defense line yards allowed2.941st
  • Offense highlight yards3.998th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.4561st
  • Offense power success1.099th
  • Defense power success allowed0.4080th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1466th
  • Defense stuff rate0.119th

Third down

  • Third down conversion45%52nd
  • Third down distance faced7.235th
  • Third down conversion allowed19%86th
  • Third down distance forced6.528th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.3483rd
  • Net success rate — second half0.2074th

Drives

  • Points per drive5.296th
  • Points per drive allowed1.177th
  • Average starting field position2852nd
  • Opponent starting field position2385th
  • Available yards gained86%96th
  • Available yards allowed30%86th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive100%99th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed83%42nd
  • Points per scoring opportunity5.295th
  • Points allowed per opportunity1.384th
  • Three-and-out rate0%99th
  • Three-and-outs forced58%98th

Roster

  • Returning usage40%46th
  • Returning EPA11053rd
  • Team talent composite80586th
  • Recruiting class rank23.084th
  • Recruiting class points23184th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Balanced attack — top 4 nationally by EPA/play
EPA/play
+0.586#5 · elite
Pass EPA/play
+0.579#26
Rush EPA/play
+0.608#2
Explosiveness
1.240#80
Pts/opportunity
5.06#34
Success rate
61.5%

Near-equal efficiency edge: 0.030 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — top 8 nationally in EPA/play allowed
EPA/play allowed
-0.125#10 · elite
Havoc rate (total)
14.0%#105
Front-7 havoc
8.8%
DB havoc
5.1%
Big play rate allowed
0.986#8
Success rate allowed
34.4%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

50.0 PPG offense, 13.0 allowed — +37.0 margin/game
Points per game
50.0
Points allowed/game
13.0
Scoring margin/game
+37.0
Turnover margin
-1won 0 · lost 1
Production returning
34%
Talent rank (247)
#20

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE97thEXPLOSIVENESS42thFINISHING76thFIELD POS91thDEFENSE93thHAVOC24th50th100th
Offense
97th
Explosiveness
42th
Finishing
76th
Field Pos
91th
Defense
93th
Havoc
24th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+19.2
#14
Offense
+10.6
#12
Defense
-8.6
#20
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 12 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive5.171.08
Starting field positionown 28.3own 23.1
Available yards86.4%29.7%
Scoring opportunities100.0%83.3%
Points per opportunity5.171.30
Three-and-out rate0.0%58.3%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
64.6%
Expected, given the spots
52.0%
Over expected
+12.6
Fourth down vs peers
+2
Fourth down vs the model
-50
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Mississippi State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Mississippi State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
FloridaSP+ +18.6
Off EPA/play +0.611Def EPA/play -0.073Elo 1658
Match
97%
Virginia TechSP+ +12.4
Off EPA/play +0.457Def EPA/play -0.147Elo 1421
Match
92%
IndianaSP+ +24.1
Off EPA/play +0.656Def EPA/play +0.010Elo 2113
Match
91%
SMUSP+ +11.1
Off EPA/play +0.557Def EPA/play +0.037Elo 1728
Match
91%
Notre DameSP+ +26.8
Off EPA/play +0.464Def EPA/play -0.225Elo 2021
Match
91%
VirginiaSP+ +11.5
Off EPA/play +0.430Def EPA/play -0.107Elo 1652
Match
90%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +18.8, #12 of 1282016: +0.4, #61 of 1282017: +18.5, #16 of 1302018: +23.6, #7 of 1302019: +6.1, #40 of 1302020: -6.8, #86 of 1242021: +14.7, #20 of 1302022: +14.5, #17 of 1312023: -7.1, #92 of 1332024: -9.1, #97 of 1342025: +0.1, #64 of 1362026: +19.2, #14 of 138
20152026
Now +19.2 · #14 of 138Best +23.6 in 2018Worst -9.1 in 2024

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20262-00-0
100%
2.0+0.0
20255-81-7
38%
5.1-0.1
20242-100-8
17%
2.3-0.3
20235-71-7
42%
4.8+0.2
20229-44-4
69%
6.9+2.1
20217-64-4
54%
6.1+0.9
20204-73-7
36%
2.5+1.5
20196-73-5
46%
6.3-0.3
20188-54-4
62%
8.7-0.7
20179-44-4
69%
9.5-0.5

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

2.1%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 5.1-6.9.

If they finish with…

95%
2 losses
24%
3 losses
0.1%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

up 0.2 points since preseasonwon 62-13 over UL Monroe against an expected margin of +36, so +12.9 against the number.

  • At 3 losses they are 24% where the average SEC team is 41%.
  • The SEC takes 3.83 bids in an average season, and four or more in 65%.

Mississippi State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk7at LSU9.8
  • wk9at Texas9.5
  • wk3at South Carolina6.0
  • wk8vs Oklahoma5.9
  • wk5vs Alabama5.9
  • wk13at Ole Miss5.7

Who to root for

Games Mississippi State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk7UL Monroe over Louisiana Tech0.6
  • wk5Arkansas over Texas A&M0.5
  • wk5Kentucky over South Carolina0.4
  • wk8App State over James Madison0.4
  • wk2Arizona State over Texas A&M0.4
  • wk2Clemson over Georgia Southern0.4
The full playoff picture →

SEC

0-0 in league play, projected 2.6-6.414 of 16 by title odds
0.2%
Wins the SEC
0.7%
Reaches the title game

The SEC sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 48% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk9Mississippi State at Texas1.5
  • wk7Mississippi State at LSU1.4

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole SEC race →

If not the playoff, then

38%
Bowl eligible
37%
Placed in a bowl
2.1%
In the playoff
60%
Season over in November

Mississippi State is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.5% they go with five wins, as a 5-7 fill-in — which in reality is decided by academic progress rate, not by anything modelled here.

  • Birmingham Bowl6.9%
  • Liberty Bowl6.0%
  • Texas Bowl5.6%
  • Music City Bowl4.6%
  • Duke's Mayo Bowl3.8%
  • Gator Bowl2.7%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 8 have sent Mississippi State a player since 2010 — 14 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Mississippi State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
CarverGA31
StephensonGA21
Archbishop RummelLA20
CallawayGA20
Edna KarrLA20
Pine ForestFL11
John TylerTX10
ParkwayLA10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.