Skip to content
Kamario Taylor

#1Kamario Taylor

Kamario Taylor is a Dual-Threat QB for Mississippi State. Kamario's 2025 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 130 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kamario Taylor's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
43/77 Comp/Att629 Pass yards5 Pass TD1 INT55.8% Comp %
Rushing
458 Rush yards8 Rush TD82 Carries5.6 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

33
Attempts
8.5y
Avg depth
6.6y
After catch
64%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.5 yards in the air on an average throw 0.7 yards deeper than the median. Another 6.6 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
1
0% · 0y
1
100% · 25y
short
10
60% · 74y
6
83% · 81y
14
64% · 104y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume55
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency79
  • Clutch20
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.49 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.58 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5801.58Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: +1.05 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Alcorn State: +1.03 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: +1.58 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: +0.04 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Florida: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: +1.19 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: +0.29 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: +0.62 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri: +0.19 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Ole Miss: +0.29 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Southern MissW34-17-7.1301.05
3vsAlcorn StateW63-02/34610100.04001.03
4vsNorthern IllinoisW38-10-16.72601.58
5vsTennesseeL34-4115.01000.04
8@FloridaL21-233.51310.49
9vsTexasL38-4516.21/111099.9001.19
10@ArkansasW38-355.12/5401095.95510.29
11vsGeorgiaL21-4124.16/10870085.65330.62
12@MissouriL27-4914.44/5361085.42200.19
14vsOle MissL19-3824.015/311780184.417320.29
20vsWake ForestL29-435.713/222411056.5631

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.2%
Passing plays
23.2%
Rushing plays
16.2%
Standard downs
17.8%
Passing downs
21.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.07 / 0.74

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.