Skip to content
Fluff Bothwell

#24Fluff Bothwell

Fluff Bothwell is a Explosive Back for Mississippi State. Fluff's 2026 season produced 14.1 total EPA across 30 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

19%
projected
band 11%'25 21%26%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Fluff Bothwell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
165 Rush yards2 Rush TD27 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions19 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume58
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving42
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Peak game: 0.57 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Minnesota (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5700.57Wk 1 vs UL Monroe: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Minnesota: +0.57 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUL MonroeW62-13-33.29525.8011600.30
2@MinnesotaW38-139.6181136.321300.57

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.3%
Passing plays
4.7%
Rushing plays
32.5%
Standard downs
19.1%
Passing downs
24.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.57
Passing downs
0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.06 / 0.52

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.