Skip to content
Xavier Gayten

#5Xavier Gayten

Xavier Gayten is a Committee Back for Mississippi State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Xavier Gayten's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
157 Rush yards2 Rush TD29 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions2 Rec yards0 Rec TD0.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume16
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving58
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.78 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.12 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Alcorn State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1201.12Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: -0.35 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Alcorn State: +1.12 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: +0.95 EPA/play4Wk 8 vs Florida: -0.50 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: -0.40 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Missouri: -0.10 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Ole Miss: -0.11 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Southern MissW34-17-7.11-40-0.35
3vsAlcorn StateW63-045012.511.12
4vsNorthern IllinoisW38-10-16.744511.310.95
5vsTennesseeL34-4115.0
8@FloridaL21-233.56274.50-0.50
9vsTexasL38-4516.2331.00150-0.40
12@MissouriL27-4914.45163.20110-0.10
14vsOle MissL19-3824.0284.00-0.11
20vsWake ForestL29-435.7581.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.6%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
9.0%
Standard downs
6.4%
Passing downs
3.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.23
Passing downs
-0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.44 / -0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.