Skip to content
Zack Moss

#2Zack Moss

RB·Utah·201920183.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Zack Moss is a 2-year Featured Back for Utah. Zack's 2019 season ranks in the 68th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 254 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zack Moss's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1416 Rush yards15 Rush TD235 Carries6.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions388 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency58
  • Receiving54
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.38 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.09 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Oregon State (SP+ -1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0902.09Wk 1 vs BYU: +0.43 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Illinois: +0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Idaho State: +0.80 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs USC: -0.12 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Oregon State: +2.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona State: +0.25 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs California: +0.48 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs UCLA: +0.70 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +0.34 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado: -0.07 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Oregon: +0.10 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Texas: -0.00 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@BYUW30-121.3291876.412700.43
2vsNorthern IllinoisW35-17-13.918804.420.03
3vsIdaho StateW31-01010610.610.80
4@USCL23-3013.16203.30-0.12
7@Oregon StateW52-7-0.7512124.222.09
8vsArizona StateW21-36.325994.0237800.25
9vsCaliforniaW35-0-2.6171156.8238900.48
10@WashingtonW33-2818.3271003.7154110.17
12vsUCLAW49-3-3.9171277.5247300.70
13@ArizonaW35-7-8.0262037.8143200.34
14vsColoradoW45-15-4.120884.411-30-0.07
15vsOregonL15-3719.0191135.9045710.10
1vsTexasL10-3812.016573.602140-0.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.2%
Passing plays
9.3%
Rushing plays
44.8%
Standard downs
33.4%
Passing downs
25.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.310−0.342019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Utah
3.0
66.1
2019Utah
3.7
85.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.