Skip to content
Saquon Barkley

#26Saquon Barkley

RB·Penn State·201720163.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Saquon Barkley is a 2-year Featured Back for Penn State. Saquon's 2016 season ranks in the 45th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 303 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Saquon Barkley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1496 Rush yards18 Rush TD272 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions402 Rec yards4 Rec TD14.4 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns74 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency45
  • Volume93
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency53
  • Receiving50
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)45th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.25 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Purdue (SP+ -11).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3504.8107.4
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8000.80Wk 1 vs Kent State: +0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Temple: +0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan: +0.10 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Minnesota: -0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Maryland: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Ohio State: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Purdue: +0.80 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Iowa: +0.71 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Indiana: -0.17 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +0.37 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: -0.09 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wisconsin: +0.30 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs USC: +0.34 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsKent StateW33-13-12.0221054.8111700.24
2@PittsburghL39-4213.120854.3424510.14
3vsTempleW34-2711.99687.612700.04
4@MichiganL10-4924.415593.9057700.10
5vsMinnesotaW29-2612.620633.211-30-0.38
6vsMarylandW38-14-0.6312026.510.04
8vsOhio StateW24-2122.412998.300.35
9@PurdueW62-24-11.01820711.5237000.80
10vsIowaW41-1410.3201678.4114410.71
11@IndianaW45-314.633581.822340-0.17
12@RutgersW39-0-14.916925.8122500.37
13vsMichigan StateW45-127.412141.212110-0.09
14vsWisconsinW38-3116.119834.4122010.30
1vsUSCL49-5223.6251947.8255510.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.6%
Passing plays
9.0%
Rushing plays
52.7%
Standard downs
40.1%
Passing downs
15.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.512017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Penn State
3.9
97.9
2017Penn State
5.2
98.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.