Skip to content
Noah Short

#15Noah Short

WR·Army·202520240.0 pts line value1st Round

Noah Short is a 2-year Slot Specialist WR for Army. Noah's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 147 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Noah Short's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
571 Rush yards1 Rush TD98 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
32 Receptions438 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume49
  • Explosiveness45
  • Consistency45
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.19 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Air Force (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
D.J. FosterArizona State0.2001.034.8
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 1 vs Tarleton State: +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs North Texas: -0.29 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs East Carolina: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: -0.11 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Charlotte: -0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulane: +0.03 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Air Force: +0.53 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.05 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Tulsa: -0.01 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UTSA: +0.38 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs Navy: +0.38 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsTarleton StateL27-3068113.50270.34
2@Kansas StateW24-217.02157.50180.44
4vsNorth TexasL38-4513.811010.0010-0.29
5@East CarolinaL6-288.03134.30110.38
6@UABW31-13-15.8-0.11
7vsCharlotteW24-7-26.714444.0044-0.29
8@TulaneL17-246.311111.00110.03
10@Air ForceW20-17-3.235217.31400.53
11vsTempleW14-13-5.10.05
13vsTulsaL25-26-10.044711.8044-0.01
14@UTSAW27-243.7166.0060.38
16vsNavyL16-176.235117.00290.38
20vsUConnW41-165.1710815.4140

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.0%
Passing plays
40.9%
Rushing plays
13.1%
Standard downs
13.1%
Passing downs
27.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.560−0.592025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024Army
0.5
20.7
2025Army
0.0
5.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.