Skip to content
De'Michael Harris
De'Michael Harris

#18De'Michael Harris

WR·Southern Miss·20190.7 pts line value1st Round

De'Michael Harris is a Possession Receiver WR for Southern Miss. De'Michael's 2019 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 149 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So De'Michael Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
541 Rush yards5 Rush TD113 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
34 Receptions346 Rec yards3 Rec TD10.2 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns282 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume53
  • Explosiveness21
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down89
Player type
Possession Receiver WR

Chain-mover who earns targets through reliability. High volume, short-to-intermediate routes, consistent floor every week.

High target shareChain moverReliable floor
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.17 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Tulane (SP+ 8).

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
D.J. FosterArizona State0.2001.034.8
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.2101.932.1
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1701.17Wk 2 vs Mississippi State: +0.50 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: -0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Alabama: +0.11 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UTEP: +0.77 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.55 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rice: -0.26 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs UAB: -0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTSA: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: -0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.01 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Tulane: +1.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@Mississippi StateL15-383.50.50
3@TroyW47-42-4.44184.5012-0.13
4@AlabamaL7-4932.435016.71370.11
5vsUTEPW31-13-25.628040.01740.77
7vsNorth TexasW45-27-6.157915.81590.40
8@Louisiana TechL30-450.2-0.55
9@RiceW20-6-18.03113.705-0.26
11vsUABW37-2-1.41-1-1.000-0.47
12@UTSAW36-17-23.75224.4070.10
13vsWestern KentuckyL10-281.7111.001-0.38
14@Florida AtlanticL17-34-0.66376.2020-0.01
1vsTulaneL13-307.544912.30281.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.7%
Passing plays
9.6%
Rushing plays
29.4%
Standard downs
22.1%
Passing downs
12.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / -0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.350−0.72
EPA per play · 2019 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.