Skip to content
Davis Bryson

#9Davis Bryson

WR·Kennesaw State·20240.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Davis Bryson is a Workhorse Receiver WR for Kennesaw State. Davis's 2024 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 349 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Davis Bryson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
143/261 Comp/Att1494 Pass yards6 Pass TD10 INT54.8% Comp %
Rushing
293 Rush yards4 Rush TD112 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Workhorse Receiver WR

The primary target in the offense — used across all situations and down-types at an elite volume.

Top target shareAll-down utilityOffense runs through this player
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used WRs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3702.9101.8
D.J. FosterArizona State0.2001.034.8
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.2101.932.1
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.3101.039.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · EPA per play, week by week

+0.2900.29Wk 1 vs UTSA: -0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs San José State: +0.04 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UT Martin: -0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Jacksonville State: -0.26 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Liberty: +0.24 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.17 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Sam Houston: +0.09 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida International: +0.15 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.25 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+EPA/playPassRush
1@UTSAL16-282.2-0.010.05-0.13
2vsLouisianaL10-344.80.290.54-0.11
3@San José StateL10-31-5.50.040.18-0.37
5vsUT MartinL13-24-0.22-0.340.47
6vsJacksonville StateL24-63-1.0-0.26-0.24-0.33
9vsLibertyW27-240.20.240.35-0.08
10@Western KentuckyL14-31-2.20.02-0.260.81
11@UTEPL35-43-22.70.170.060.40
12vsSam HoustonL17-23-6.90.090.040.20
13vsFlorida InternationalW27-26-12.10.150.120.25
14@Louisiana TechL0-33-11.6-0.25-0.26-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.8%
Passing plays
95.7%
Rushing plays
24.6%
Standard downs
45.6%
Passing downs
67.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.18
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.03 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.350−0.31
EPA per play · 2024 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.