Skip to content
D.J. Foster

#8D.J. Foster

WR·Arizona State·201420131.0 pts line value1st Round

D.J. Foster is a 2-year Workhorse Receiver WR for Arizona State. D.J.'s 2014 season ranks in the 29th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 250 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So D.J. Foster's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1081 Rush yards9 Rush TD194 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
62 Receptions688 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency29
  • Volume83
  • Explosiveness27
  • Consistency66
  • Pass-Down80
Player type
Workhorse Receiver WR

The primary target in the offense — used across all situations and down-types at an elite volume.

Top target shareAll-down utilityOffense runs through this player
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)29th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used WRs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Washington State (SP+ -2).

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.2101.932.1
Zach AbeyNavy0.3702.9101.8
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.3101.039.7
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7300.73Wk 1 vs Weber State: +0.61 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs New Mexico: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado: +0.50 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs USC: -0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Stanford: +0.12 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington: +0.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Utah: -0.11 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Notre Dame: +0.32 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Oregon State: +0.09 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Washington State: +0.73 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arizona: -0.02 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Duke: +0.37 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsWeber StateW45-144266.50160.61
2@New MexicoW58-23-15.035418.00390.73
3@ColoradoW38-24-5.045914.81270.50
5vsUCLAL27-6217.756813.6020
6@USCW38-3417.157314.6129-0.15
8vsStanfordW26-1021.479213.10270.12
9@WashingtonW24-107.845213.00310.01
10vsUtahW19-168.86284.7011-0.11
11vsNotre DameW55-3110.811010.00100.32
12@Oregon StateL27-353.28658.11170.09
13vsWashington StateW52-31-1.755911.80420.73
14@ArizonaL35-427.67608.6016-0.02
1vsDukeW36-317.034214.00280.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.2%
Passing plays
17.7%
Rushing plays
41.9%
Standard downs
31.5%
Passing downs
24.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.060−0.612014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Arizona State
0.0
1.7
2014Arizona State
1.0
34.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.