Skip to content
LeVante Bellamy

#2LeVante Bellamy

RB·Western Michigan·20195.4 pts line value1st Round

LeVante Bellamy is a Featured Back for Western Michigan. LeVante's 2019 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 275 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So LeVante Bellamy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1472 Rush yards23 Rush TD266 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions55 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving30
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (80th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -28).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Blake CorumMichigan0.3805.1107.5
Bijan RobinsonTexas0.3905.9107.6
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9000.90Wk 1 vs Monmouth: -0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +0.79 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Syracuse: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Central Michigan: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Toledo: -0.02 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Miami (OH): +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Bowling Green: +0.90 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Ball State: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ohio: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Northern Illinois: +0.26 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: -0.14 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMonmouthW48-1318532.91-0.01
2@Michigan StateL17-517.215442.903130-0.15
3vsGeorgia StateW57-10-10.51519212.830.79
4@SyracuseL33-52-3.01516511.023800.19
5vsCentral MichiganW31-15-4.4251054.21-0.07
6@ToledoL24-31-13.713705.412110-0.02
7vsMiami (OH)W38-16-9.2221356.123500.10
8@Eastern MichiganL27-34-8.6281134.030.24
9vsBowling GreenW49-10-27.51717810.540.90
11vsBall StateW35-31-4.5311575.1311100.36
12@OhioW37-343.728722.611000.04
14@Northern IllinoisL14-17-13.9211286.121500.26
1vsWestern KentuckyL20-231.718603.30120-0.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.0%
Passing plays
5.1%
Rushing plays
54.4%
Standard downs
35.6%
Passing downs
20.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.41 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.000−0.25
EPA per play · 2019 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.