Skip to content
Ameer Abdullah

#8Ameer Abdullah

RB·Nebraska·201420135.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Ameer Abdullah is a 2-year Featured Back for Nebraska. Ameer's 2014 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 283 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ameer Abdullah's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1611 Rush yards19 Rush TD264 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions269 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.2 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Kick returns392 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency55
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Rutgers (SP+ -2).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Blake CorumMichigan0.3805.1107.5
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0
LeVante BellamyWestern Michigan0.4005.4107.6
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3605.0106.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs McNeese: +0.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Fresno State: -0.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami: +0.51 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Illinois: +0.84 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan State: -0.25 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Northwestern: +0.17 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rutgers: +0.86 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Purdue: -0.26 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: -0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Minnesota: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Iowa: +0.33 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs USC: -0.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida AtlanticW55-7-10.42123211.011900.57
2vsMcNeeseW31-2417543.2139610.27
3@Fresno StateW55-19-6.9191105.81-0.06
4vsMiamiW41-3113.9352296.521310.51
5vsIllinoisW45-140.4222089.530.84
6@Michigan StateL22-2724.124451.922220-0.25
8@NorthwesternW38-171.5231466.3441300.17
9vsRutgersW42-24-1.51922511.8322600.86
10vsPurdueW35-14-6.2610.20-0.26
12@WisconsinL24-5920.818693.801260-0.07
13vsMinnesotaL24-286.820984.910.23
14@IowaW37-346.8131068.2021310.33
1vsUSCL42-4517.127883.316610-0.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.9%
Passing plays
8.8%
Rushing plays
46.3%
Standard downs
35.3%
Passing downs
20.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.970−0.372014
EPA per play · 2013 — 2014 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2013Nebraska
3.2
33.3
2014Nebraska
5.3
99.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.