Skip to content
Bijan Robinson

#5Bijan Robinson

RB·Texas·202220215.9 pts line value1st Round

Bijan Robinson is a 2-year Featured Back for Texas. Bijan's 2022 season ranks in the 85th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 280 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bijan Robinson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1578 Rush yards18 Rush TD258 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions314 Rec yards2 Rec TD16.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency85
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency69
  • Receiving41
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)85th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (85th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Kansas (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
LeVante BellamyWestern Michigan0.4005.4107.6
Najee HarrisAlabama0.4405.9121.0
Jeremy LangfordMichigan State0.4006.4118.8
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Tyler AllgeierBYU0.4406.3119.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 1 vs UL Monroe: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alabama: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UTSA: +0.67 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas Tech: +0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs West Virginia: +0.33 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oklahoma: +0.46 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Iowa State: +0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kansas State: +0.26 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs TCU: -0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kansas: +0.82 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Baylor: +0.42 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUL MonroeW52-10-15.710717.1134010.40
2vsAlabamaL19-2030.321572.7137300.16
3vsUTSAW41-207.2201839.2311900.67
4@Texas TechL34-378.5161016.3212200.12
5vsWest VirginiaW38-202.4211014.8123400.33
6vsOklahomaW49-015.4221305.9221500.46
7vsIowa StateW24-215.3281354.8043600.15
8@Oklahoma StateL34-4111.3241405.8114110.21
10@Kansas StateW34-2721.4302097.0123400.26
11vsTCUL10-1724.312292.40-0.47
12@KansasW55-142.9252439.740.82
13vsBaylorW38-2711.7291796.220.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
35.4%
Passing plays
8.0%
Rushing plays
59.3%
Standard downs
39.4%
Passing downs
25.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.66 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.200−0.632022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Texas
2.7
60.6
2022Texas
5.9
107.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.