Skip to content
Royce Freeman

#21Royce Freeman

RB·Oregon·2017201520145.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Royce Freeman is a 3-year Featured Back for Oregon. Royce's 2015 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 307 plays — a average rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Royce Freeman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2014

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9831
National rank
#34
High school
Imperial
Hometown
Imperial, CA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2015 Production

Rushing
1836 Rush yards17 Rush TD283 Carries6.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
26 Receptions348 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency85
  • Receiving42
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Eastern Washington.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3605.0106.9
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3504.8107.4
Mohamed IbrahimMinnesota0.3305.3103.6
Jaret PattersonBuffalo0.3705.6118.0
Blake CorumMichigan0.3805.1107.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Eastern Washington: +0.86 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +0.72 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: +0.44 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Washington State: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Arizona State: +0.45 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs California: +0.31 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Stanford: +0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon State: +0.51 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs TCU: +0.47 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEastern WashingtonW61-42211808.6321800.86
2@Michigan StateL28-3115.624923.8133400.03
3vsGeorgia StateW61-28-6.71010110.112300.72
4vsUtahL20-6211.014775.5024610.46
5@ColoradoW41-24-4.0271636.0233200.44
6vsWashington StateL38-454.2272469.1234610.48
7@WashingtonW26-209.7271385.100.23
9@Arizona StateW61-5510.2151107.3233700.45
10vsCaliforniaW44-2812.1291806.201800.31
11@StanfordW38-3622.8161056.610.16
12vsUSCW48-2816.8201477.3025000.35
13vsOregon StateW52-42-10.1271676.2235100.51
1vsTCUL41-4719.0261305.0322300.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.9%
Passing plays
7.1%
Rushing plays
48.5%
Standard downs
36.2%
Passing downs
18.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.67
Pass / Rush EPA
1.10 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.980−0.4320152017
EPA per play · 2014 — 2017 · 40 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Oregon
4.3
95.5
2015Oregon
5.1
99.0
2017Oregon
2.5
62.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.