Skip to content
Jayden Daniels

#5Jayden Daniels

QB·LSU·2023202217.5 pts line value1st Round

Jayden Daniels is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for LSU. Jayden's 2023 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 435 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Daniels's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
236/327 Comp/Att3812 Pass yards40 Pass TD4 INT72.2% Comp %
Rushing
1134 Rush yards10 Rush TD135 Carries8.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency91
  • Clutch89
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency91th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.25 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.07 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Army (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
C.J. StroudOhio State0.74617.6355.2
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4
Mac JonesAlabama0.83019.2379.3
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Justin FieldsOhio State0.71317.0385.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 1 vs Florida State: +0.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Grambling: +0.81 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Mississippi State: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +0.57 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Missouri: +0.69 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Auburn: +0.61 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Army: +1.07 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Alabama: +0.69 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida: +1.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia State: +0.94 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas A&M: +0.73 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida StateL24-4519.422/373461161.86400.19
2vsGramblingW72-1018/242695089.72900.81
3@Mississippi StateW41-140.530/343612095.36420.68
4vsArkansasW34-313.520/293204185.43600.57
5@Ole MissL49-5518.427/364144092.79910.69
6@MissouriW49-3919.315/212593097.113010.69
7vsAuburnW48-187.620/273253190.79300.61
8vsArmyW62-0-4.011/152793096.0611.07
10@AlabamaL28-4223.115/242192197.616310.69
11vsFloridaW52-356.817/263723098.923421.07
12vsGeorgia StateW56-14-6.825/304136098.89620.94
13vsTexas A&MW42-3015.616/242354098.312000.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.6%
Passing plays
89.1%
Rushing plays
30.3%
Standard downs
56.2%
Passing downs
70.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.62
Passing downs
0.86
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / 0.84

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.320−0.422023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022LSU
8.0
266.6
2023LSU
17.5
360.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.