Skip to content
Justin Fields

#1Justin Fields

QB·Ohio State·2020201917.0 pts line value1st Round

Justin Fields is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Ohio State. Justin's 2019 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 467 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Justin Fields's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
238/354 Comp/Att3273 Pass yards41 Pass TD3 INT67.2% Comp %
Rushing
484 Rush yards10 Rush TD137 Carries3.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.15 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Rutgers (SP+ -15).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
C.J. StroudOhio State0.74617.6355.2
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4
Jayden DanielsLSU0.78317.5360.8
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Bo NixOregon0.72216.7390.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1501.15Wk 1 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cincinnati: +0.52 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Indiana: +0.51 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami (OH): +0.84 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Nebraska: +0.60 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan State: +0.40 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Northwestern: +0.53 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wisconsin: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Maryland: +0.69 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +1.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Penn State: +0.29 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan: +0.64 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Wisconsin: +0.36 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.19 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida AtlanticW45-21-0.618/252344096.16110.45
2vsCincinnatiW42-09.120/252242089.54220.52
3@IndianaW51-1012.814/241993087.71110.51
4vsMiami (OH)W76-5-9.214/212234092.13620.84
5@NebraskaW48-72.615/212123099.07210.60
6vsMichigan StateW34-107.217/252062178.16110.40
8@NorthwesternW52-3-5.518/231944091.6800.53
9vsWisconsinW38-720.312/221672071.12810.47
11vsMarylandW73-14-6.316/25200302810.69
12@RutgersW56-21-14.615/19305403001.15
13vsPenn StateW28-1724.316/22188206800.29
14@MichiganW56-2720.714/25302402500.64
15vsWisconsinW34-2120.319/3129930100.36
1vsClemsonL23-2928.130/46320121300.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.2%
Passing plays
87.2%
Rushing plays
17.1%
Standard downs
40.1%
Passing downs
59.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.76
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 0.49

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.290−0.372020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Ohio State
17.0
385.1
2020Ohio State
12.7
195.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.