Skip to content
Blake Sims

#6Blake Sims

QB·Alabama·201415.4 pts line value1st Round

Blake Sims is a Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Blake's 2014 season ranks in the 95th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 465 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Blake Sims's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
252/391 Comp/Att3487 Pass yards28 Pass TD10 INT64.5% Comp %
Rushing
350 Rush yards7 Rush TD83 Carries4.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.24 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kyle TraskFlorida0.64816.3347.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0501.05Wk 1 vs West Virginia: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic: +1.05 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Southern Miss: +0.84 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida: +0.97 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Ole Miss: +0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arkansas: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas A&M: +0.74 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Tennessee: +0.82 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs LSU: +0.13 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Carolina: +0.37 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Auburn: +0.78 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Missouri: +0.56 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWest VirginiaW33-238.424/332500177.14200.50
2vsFlorida AtlanticW41-0-10.412/142282097.81411.05
3vsSouthern MissW52-12-15.912/171682097.44610.84
4vsFloridaW42-2117.323/334454181.53900.97
6@Ole MissL17-2320.719/312280166.8810.24
7@ArkansasW14-1312.211/211612027.3500.27
8vsTexas A&MW59-020.216/272683086.75410.74
9@TennesseeW34-2012.214/242862096.94210.82
11@LSUW20-1321.520/452092042.31200.13
12vsMississippi StateW25-2022.219/312111072.01800.28
13vsWestern CarolinaW48-1417/252222161.1-100.37
14vsAuburnW55-4424.220/273124390.12310.78
15vsMissouriW42-1319.323/272622069.21900.56
1vsOhio StateL35-4225.822/362372325.32910.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.6%
Passing plays
86.2%
Rushing plays
12.7%
Standard downs
39.9%
Passing downs
62.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.71
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.63

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.08
EPA per play · 2014 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.