Skip to content
Jayden Daniels

#5Jayden Daniels

QB·LSU·202320228.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jayden Daniels is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for LSU. Jayden's 2022 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 536 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Daniels's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
266/388 Comp/Att2913 Pass yards17 Pass TD3 INT68.6% Comp %
Rushing
885 Rush yards11 Rush TD186 Carries4.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency74
  • Clutch67
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.17 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Southern.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1701.17Wk 1 vs Florida State: +0.58 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern: +1.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Mississippi State: +0.23 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs New Mexico: +0.42 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Auburn: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tennessee: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida: +0.70 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ole Miss: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Alabama: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arkansas: -0.28 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UAB: +0.66 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas A&M: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.33 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Purdue: +0.62 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida StateL23-2413.225/342092011400.58
2vsSouthernW65-1710/111373099.41811.17
3vsMississippi StateW31-1615.422/372101068.99310.23
4vsNew MexicoW38-0-26.924/292790076.73700.42
5@AuburnW21-175.18/20800061.65910.09
6vsTennesseeL13-4025.232/453001156.73800.12
7@FloridaW45-3510.423/323493093.64430.70
8vsOle MissW45-2016.221/282482085.412130.51
10vsAlabamaW32-3130.322/321822085.49510.19
11@ArkansasW13-1012.08/1586019.7100-0.28
12vsUABW41-10-0.522/292971095.811110.66
13@Texas A&ML23-389.121/351890077.88400.19
14vsGeorgiaL30-5035.316/2420811-600.33
1vsPurdueW63-77.712/17139106700.62

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.9%
Passing plays
81.5%
Rushing plays
29.7%
Standard downs
52.5%
Passing downs
68.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.54

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.320−0.422023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022LSU
8.0
266.6
2023LSU
17.5
360.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.