Skip to content

Southern Miss Golden Eagles

Sun Belt·1-1·
Elo
1350#106
SP+
-14.9#118
FPI
-3.0
AP
NR
Nextvs UConn · Wk 3Win prob 68%Model -7.4
Talent #94 (602.6)Recruiting class #10890% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Southern Miss

All news

Southern Miss's passing game is Auburn's biggest problem

Matchup · 6d ago

Ethan Hampton produced six of Southern Miss's eight explosive plays

Matchup · Sep 6

Roster · 112 players

FR 18SO 27JR 45SR 22
#PlayerPosClHtWt
5Ethan HamptonQBSR6'3"220
12John WhiteQBSO6'0"193
15Hugh PriceQBFR6'6"204
16Maddox McCroryQBFR6'1"185
18Landry LyddyQBSR6'0"208
2Robert BriggsRBSR5'7"183
6Jamarice WilderRBFR5'9"187
14Steven RobinsonRBJR5'9"208
20Robert HendersonRBSO5'10"195
22Jaylen FosterRBJR5'11"190
25Josiah BastenRBJR5'9"190
26Brandon HoodRBSO5'10"200
27John FordRBFR5'9"180
0Eelijah SingletonWRJR5'10"190
1Mario SandersWRSR5'10"191
3MJ JohnsonWRJR5'10"180
7Kaden SaundersWRJR5'10"175
8AJ LittleWRJR5'11"200
9Jaylen HimesWRSO5'9"185
11Davis DaltonWRSR6'3"207
13Grant PageWRSR6'3"200
19Cace ReedWRSO5'10"160
23Trey HorneWRJR6'3"200
38Nehemiah TaylorWRSO5'11"190
80King David AboyaWRFR6'3"195
83Dillon RowleyWRSO5'10"174
86Israel LeamonWRFR5'11"180
81Preston KilgoreTEJR6'4"240
82Connor GoodingTESO6'4"230
84Broderick PetersTEFR6'4"245
85Javery MayberryTESO6'3"245
87Caston BrownTESO6'2"228
88Jeremiah Beck Jr.TEJR6'2"237
89Drew BilderbackTEFR6'3"235
50Joe RoundsOLSR6'0"315
53Toby MealerOLFR6'5"335
54Dante DevineOLJR6'7"325
55Zerian HudsonOLSR6'3"334
56Greg NunneryOLSR6'4"320
56Brayden WarnerOLJR6'3"311
61Kendrick WatkinsOLSR6'2"310
62Aloali'i MauiOLSR6'1"310
64Camden MyersOLSO6'3"300
68Grant KitchensOLFR6'7"329
70Braden CainOLJR6'4"310
71Jahmir DavisOLSO6'5"301
72Will BurgessOLSO6'6"275
73Hayden BrealOLFR6'0"281
74Luke RogersOLJR6'3"305
75Casey Jean-BaptisteOLJR6'5"320
76Larry EdwardsOLJR6'5"290
77Chase MalamalaOLSO6'6"297
78Christian YoungOLSR6'4"335
79Liam CassidyOLJR6'5"320
5Nasim CairoDLSR6'2"280
7Kameron CyprienDLJR6'3"250
11A'mari WilsonDLJR6'6"265
15Jeffery Rush Jr.DLSO6'1"265
16Jameer LewisDLSR6'2"230
17Ramon PernasDLSO6'3"237
31Zachariah KeithDLJR6'6"280
41Will SmithDLSO6'2"240
43KJ WashingtonDLFR6'3"235
52Xavier McIverDLSR6'0"305
57Jeramie PoseyDLJR6'2"266
88Darrell GrossDLJR6'1"292
90JR StegallDLJR6'2"326
92David GriffinDLJR6'1"299
93Travis BendolphDLJR6'1"285
94Talik ParkmanDLFR6'3"295
95Josh JohnsonDLJR6'0"320
97Ari SlocumDLFR6'3"305
98Kei'shaun MashburnDLJR6'2"300
99Cam'ron HoyteDLJR6'4"295
0Caleb TriplettLBFR6'0"219
2Tyler LassiterLBSO6'3"230
6Andrew MartinLBSR6'0"212
13Mathis HaygoodLBJR6'4"230
33Avery SledgeLBSR6'2"220
34Marrio Williams Jr.LBSO6'1"220
35Wesley EdisonLBSO6'3"230
42Melvin SpriggsLBJR6'2"220
49BJ MitchellLBJR5'9"218
51Ricky HardingLBJR6'1"220
8Ishmael IbraheemCBSR6'0"178
19Malakai MurphyCBSO6'1"195
29Jeremiah DillonCBSR6'2"193
1Champ LewisDBJR6'0"183
3Jyaire BrownDBSR5'11"180
12Laquan RobinsonDBSR6'1"210
14Jordan PrideDBSO6'1"210
16Jonah MartinezDBJR6'0"180
20Kolby PeavyDBJR5'11"193
21Sammy Anderson Jr.DBSR6'1"190
22Kobi AlbertDBJR5'11"175
23Hiroshi CarrDBJR6'1"186
24Michael Robinson IIIDBJR6'0"190
25Landon SylvieDBJR5'10"183
26Baron TaylorDBJR6'0"190
28Kelby HamptonDBSO6'1"189
30Trevor WintonDBFR5'11"170
39Johnnie EvansDBJR5'11"195
47Cannon McClainDBJR6'2"184
18MaLik CaswellSSO6'0"185
27Chauncey Davis Jr.SFR6'1"195
37Aidan HorneSFR6'3"187
40Creighton WilbanksPKSO5'10"176
96Reed HarradinePKJR6'4"225
36Dusty ZimmerPSO6'3"230
30Andrew TateLSJR5'11"203
46Luke BeardLSJR6'1"218
48Colin KapilovicLSSO6'0"212

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
28.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
23.0
scoring defense
Differential
+5.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
382.0#84
Yards / play
5.4#108
Passing yards / game
198.5#96
Rushing yards / game
183.5#56
First downs / game
22.0#56
3rd down %
40.0%#73
4th down %
50.0%#70
Time of possession
29:16#89
Defense
Yards allowed / game
416.5#118
Yards / play allowed
5.9#110
Pass yards allowed / game
193.0#62
Rush yards allowed / game
223.5#132
3rd down % allowed
41.4%#101
Sacks
2#106
Tackles for loss
10#79
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+3#15
Takeaways
6#5
Giveaways
3#74
Penalties / game
7.5#90
Penalty yards / game
55.0#66

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Southern Miss is in year 1 under Blake Anderson, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are offensive, led by 9th at hitting chunk plays.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+0.9%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −25.0% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Southern Miss has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #9
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
7.44.6
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
6.4
of 10 games
Bowl odds
90%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
83%
vs Arkansas State
Toughest
48%
vs Tulane

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 25% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (25%)Bowl eligible 90% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
RBRobert Briggs, Jamarice Wilder +1
+17.8 EPA
WRGrant Page, MJ Johnson +4
+16.2 EPA
QBEthan Hampton
+9.3 EPA
TEPreston Kilgore, Broderick Peters +1
+1.9 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +9.30.170/play55 snaps
EPA +8.40.301/play28 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.2355th#62
Def0.1634th#91
Explosiveness
Off1.1016th#116
Def1.4022nd#108
Field position
Off74.285th#21
Def74.032nd#94
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off6.2299th#2
Def3.3647th#73
Turnovers
Won 6Lost 3
Margin +3

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.2028th#100
Off · rush
0.3585th#21

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.3585th#21
Def0.249th#125
Passing
Off0.2026th#102
Def0.3128th#100

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.75#20
2nd-level / open-field
1.12 / 0.56
Power / stuff (off)
72.7% / 10.0%
Havoc — total (def)
13.7%#110
Havoc — front 7 / DB
8.9% / 4.8%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.21
Def-0.06
Pass downs
Off0.31
Def0.57

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.05#1040.44#290.40#91
Defense-0.22#270.11#660.53#96

Elo Trajectory

Alcorn StateFinal
Elo rating 13501285-65 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.1326th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.0850th
  • Offense success rate47%61st
  • Defense success rate allowed37%55th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs51%60th
  • Offense success — passing downs39%76th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs33%87th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs41%7th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness0.961st
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.415th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.9020th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.831st

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.477th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.024th
  • Offense highlight yards0.327th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.130th
  • Offense power success0.7653rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.3686th
  • Offense stuff rate0.0896th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2254th

Third down

  • Third down conversion42%47th
  • Third down distance faced5.492nd
  • Third down conversion allowed46%20th
  • Third down distance forced7.453rd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1572nd
  • Net success rate — second half0.0855th

Drives

  • Points per drive-0.182nd
  • Points per drive allowed3.419th
  • Average starting field position202nd
  • Opponent starting field position2760th
  • Available yards gained21%6th
  • Available yards allowed77%6th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive55%7th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%12th
  • Points per scoring opportunity0.838th
  • Points allowed per opportunity3.429th
  • Three-and-out rate36%26th
  • Three-and-outs forced0%7th

Roster

  • Returning usage92%96th
  • Returning EPA28996th
  • Team talent composite60332nd
  • Recruiting class rank10822nd
  • Recruiting class points17522nd

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.234#62 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.200#102
Rush EPA/play
+0.353#21
Explosiveness
1.101#116
Pts/opportunity
6.22#2
Success rate
50.0%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.153 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.157#91 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
13.7%#110
Front-7 havoc
8.9%
DB havoc
4.8%
Big play rate allowed
1.402#108
Success rate allowed
39.8%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

Points per game
28.5
Points allowed/game
23.0
Scoring margin/game
+5.5
Turnover margin
+3won 6 · lost 3
Production returning
90%
Talent rank (247)
#94

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE55thEXPLOSIVENESS16thFINISHING99thFIELD POS85thDEFENSE34thHAVOC20th50th100th
Offense
55th
Explosiveness
16th
Finishing
99th
Field Pos
85th
Defense
34th
Havoc
20th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-16.5
#127
Offense
-8.8
#117
Defense
+7.7
#120
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive-0.183.44
Starting field positionown 20.2own 27.3
Available yards21.2%76.7%
Scoring opportunities54.5%100.0%
Points per opportunity0.833.44
Three-and-out rate36.4%0.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
65.8%
Expected, given the spots
52.0%
Over expected
+13.8
Fourth down vs peers
+13
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Southern Miss is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Southern Miss in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Texas TechSP+ +18.9
Off EPA/play +0.221Def EPA/play +0.125Elo 1870
Match
98%
TulaneSP+ -7.4
Off EPA/play +0.200Def EPA/play +0.138Elo 1529
Match
98%
TexasSP+ +25.4
Off EPA/play +0.279Def EPA/play +0.149Elo 1913
Match
97%
LouisianaSP+ -5.7
Off EPA/play +0.249Def EPA/play +0.208Elo 1389
Match
97%
ArizonaSP+ +12.6
Off EPA/play +0.185Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1625
Match
97%
San José StateSP+ -12.8
Off EPA/play +0.184Def EPA/play +0.135Elo 1413
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +10.0, #36 of 1282016: -1.1, #65 of 1282017: -5.1, #81 of 1302018: -0.3, #65 of 1302019: -3.1, #69 of 1302020: -14.2, #106 of 1242021: -22.4, #117 of 1302022: -4.1, #79 of 1312023: -16.0, #113 of 1332024: -35.7, #133 of 1342025: -6.7, #86 of 1362026: -16.5, #127 of 138
20152026
Now -16.5 · #127 of 138Best +10.0 in 2015Worst -35.7 in 2024

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.0+0.0
20257-65-3
54%
6.9+0.1
20241-110-8
8%
1.5-0.5
20233-92-6
25%
4.1-1.1
20227-64-4
54%
6.9+0.1
20213-92-6
25%
4.3-1.3
20203-72-4
30%
3.5-0.5
20197-65-3
54%
6.7+0.3
20186-55-3
55%
5.6+0.4
20178-56-2
62%
6.9+1.1

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 3.9-8.1. Wins the Sun Belt in 0.5%.

If they finish with…

0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

down 0.0 points since preseason.

  • The Sun Belt takes 0.20 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.0% of seasons, having won their league in 100% of those.

Southern Miss’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4at Tulane0.1
  • wk10vs James Madison0.1
  • wk11at Louisiana Tech0.1
  • wk13at Old Dominion0.1
  • wk6at Troy0.1
  • wk8vs Louisiana0.1

Who to root for

Games Southern Miss is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk13UAB over North Texas0.1
  • wk5Temple over South Florida0.1
  • wk10Akron over Ohio0.0
  • wk6Kentucky over LSU0.0
  • wk7Rutgers over Maryland0.0
  • wk9Rutgers over Michigan0.0
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

West division · 0-0 in league play, projected 2.4-5.612 of 14 by title odds
0.5%
Wins the Sun Belt
2.0%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so Southern Miss can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk11Southern Miss at Louisiana Tech2.5
  • wk10James Madison at Southern Miss2.0
  • wk6Southern Miss at Troy1.8
  • wk8Louisiana at Southern Miss1.8

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

20%
Bowl eligible
19%
Placed in a bowl
0.0%
In the playoff
81%
Season over in November

Southern Miss is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • 68 Ventures Bowl4.0%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl3.7%
  • New Orleans Bowl3.2%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl2.4%
  • Boca Raton Bowl1.5%
  • Xbox Bowl1.4%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 7 have sent Southern Miss a player since 2010 — 20 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Southern Miss's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
CarverGA50
AuburnAL30
CallawayGA30
OxfordAL30
CentralAL21
McGill ToolenAL21
Peachtree RidgeGA20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.