Skip to content

Ohio State Buckeyes

Big Ten·1-1·
Elo
1986#3
SP+
30.0#1
FPI
30.0
AP
#1
Nextvs Kent State · Wk 3Win prob 100%Model -37.9
Talent #5 (964.3)Recruiting class #468% production returning

Roster · 119 players

FR 36SO 24JR 20SR 39
#PlayerPosClHtWt
9Tavien St. ClairQBSO6'4"235
10Julian SayinQBJR6'1"214
13Luke FaheyQBFR5'11"206
16Justyn MartinQBSR6'4"228
18Kolton StoverQBSO6'4"213
19Brady GeibelQBSO6'5"222
2Legend BeyRBFR5'10"195
21Anthony RogersRBSO5'8"203
24Ja'Kobi JacksonRBSR6'0"219
25Bo JacksonRBSO6'0"218
28Stanley Jackson Jr.RBJR5'11"210
29Favour AkihRBFR5'11"197
32Isaiah WestRBSO5'10"222
0Brandon InnissWRSR6'0"197
3Devin McCuinWRSR6'0"195
4Jeremiah SmithWRJR6'4"222
5Kyle ParkerWRSR5'10"198
6Jerquaden GuilfordWRFR6'3"195
7Phillip BellWRSO6'1"195
8De'Zie JonesWRSO5'10"191
11Brock BoydWRFR6'1"196
15Chris Henry Jr.WRFR6'5"211
23Nolan BaudoWRSR5'10"185
30Amari Valerio-HudsonWRFR5'9"175
33Ryan SeimetzWRFR5'11"196
34Brennen SchrammWRSR6'0"194
80Jaeden RickettsWRFR5'11"202
82David AdolphWRSR6'5"210
38Frankie McAllisterTEFR6'5"235
83Nate RobertsTESO6'5"240
84Hunter WelcingTESR6'3"248
85Bennett ChristianTESR6'6"255
86Mason WilliamsTESR6'4"246
87Brody LennonTESO6'4"243
88Maxence LeBlancTEJR6'4"246
89Nick LautarTEFR6'6"242
51Luke MontgomeryOLSR6'5"313
57Ian GecseOLSR6'4"296
58Gabe VanSickleOLJR6'5"320
60Jaxon PowellOLFR6'4"307
62Joshua PadillaOLSR6'3"301
63Julian Goines-JacksonOLSR6'1"303
64Simon LorentzOLJR6'1"290
65Tucker SmithOLFR6'5"299
66Landry BredeOLFR6'6"320
67Austin SiereveldOLSR6'5"327
68Mason WilhelmOLFR6'3"309
69Ian MooreOLJR6'6"315
70Phillip DanielsOLSR6'5"312
72Deontae ArmstrongOLJR6'7"310
73Vasean WashingtonOLSR6'5"310
74Carter LoweOLSO6'5"318
75Carson HinzmanOLSR6'5"301
76Jake CookOLSO6'4"310
77Sam GreerOLFR6'7"320
78Max RileyOLFR6'4"302
2Kenyatta Jackson Jr.DESR6'6"263
4Qua RussawDESR6'2"244
9Zion GradyDESO6'4"262
12Beau AtkinsonDESR6'6"260
34Khary WilderDEFR6'4"257
44Epi SitanileiDESO6'4"258
56Nate RiegleDEJR6'2"227
97Dre QuinnDEFR6'4"245
3James SmithDTSR6'3"306
53Will Smith Jr.DTSR6'3"303
55John WalkerDTSR6'3"302
59Ashton YeagerDTSO6'2"287
90Damari SimeonDTFR6'2"292
91Darryus McKinleyDTFR6'3"272
94Jason MooreDTSR6'6"316
95Emanuel RuffinDTFR6'3"297
96Eddrick HoustonDTJR6'3"304
98Jamir PerezDTFR6'3"349
5Riley PettijohnLBSO6'2"235
14Christian AlliegroLBSR6'4"245
17Tarvos AlfordLBSO6'1"237
20Cincere JohnsonLBFR6'3"237
23Garrett StoverLBJR6'1"228
26Payton PierceLBJR6'1"232
33Eli LeeLBSO6'3"237
36CJ SannaLBFR6'2"235
37Zach HayesLBJR6'2"226
38Eli RiggsLBJR6'3"230
41Braxton RembertLBFR6'5"215
50Alec DelSignoreLBSR6'1"225
52Ty HowardLBSR5'11"203
54Na'il Diggs Jr.LBFR6'1"209
6Devin SanchezCBSO6'2"199
7Jermaine Mathews Jr.CBSR5'11"195
13Miles LockhartCBJR5'9"196
15Jordan ThomasCBFR6'1"198
18Cam CalhounCBSR6'0"176
19Jordyn WoodsCBSO6'4"200
24Dominick KellyCBSO6'2"193
25Jay TimmonsCBFR5'11"191
43Amar'e MillerCBFR6'0"200
39Glorien GoughDBJR5'10"196
48Jackson GulaDBSO6'1"193
1Earl Little Jr.SSR6'0"203
8Jaylen McClainSJR6'0"203
10Leroy Roker IIISJR6'0"202
11Terry MooreSSR6'0"200
16Blaine BradfordSFR6'1"212
21Brenten JonesSSR6'2"216
28Simeon CaldwellSFR6'2"210
29Deshawn StewartSSO6'0"199
30Khmari BingSFR6'0"201
32Kaden GebhardtSFR6'1"210
46Ryan RudzinskiSSR6'4"218
49Gavin ThobeSSO6'2"196
49Marcello DiomedePKSR6'1"197
92Cooper PetersonPKFR6'0"214
96Connor HawkinsPKJR6'1"200
42Joe McGuirePSR6'2"209
93Brady YoungPSR6'3"220
43Brody JenkinsLSFR6'0"197
48Dalton RiggsLSSR6'2"231
61Landon BealLSJR6'0"210

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
39.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
13.5
scoring defense
Differential
+26.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
521.5#18
Yards / play
7.7#17
Passing yards / game
356.0#5
Rushing yards / game
165.5#71
First downs / game
25.5#24
3rd down %
44.0%#61
4th down %
66.7%#41
Time of possession
30:04#74
Defense
Yards allowed / game
250.5#30
Yards / play allowed
3.6#13
Pass yards allowed / game
158.0#40
Rush yards allowed / game
92.5#46
3rd down % allowed
40.0%#89
Sacks
3#79
Tackles for loss
13#46
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#42
Takeaways
3#45
Giveaways
2#49
Penalties / game
6.5#61
Penalty yards / game
58.0#85

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

pass-leaning

Ohio State throws it: Ryan Day's offenses have been pass-leaning across 8 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 1st at throwing it. The way in is 121st at hitting chunk plays.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+1.5%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −35.0% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Ohio State has played 2 games against a genuinely tough slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensethrowing it
    #1
    projected
  • Offensefirst and second down
    #1
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #1
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #121
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
8.93.1
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
7.9
of 10 games
Bowl odds
100%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
100%
vs Kent State
Toughest
43%
vs Indiana

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 35% chance
Likeliest finish 9-3 (35%)Bowl eligible 100% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBJulian Sayin
+39.4 EPA
WRBrandon Inniss, Devin Mccuin +3
+35.6 EPA
TEBennett Christian, Mason Williams +1
+5.1 EPA
RBBo Jackson, Isaiah West +1
+0.9 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBJulian Sayin
~$1.0M
EPA +39.40.616/play64 snaps
EPA +28.81.199/play24 snaps
RBBo Jackson
~$174K
EPA +5.10.149/play34 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3680th#29
Def0.0466th#48
Explosiveness
Off1.3671st#41
Def1.0782nd#25
Field position
Off70.463rd#52
Def74.728th#100
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.1451st#68
Def3.8631st#96
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 2
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.6187th#19
Off · rush
0.0221st#109

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.0222nd#108
Def0.1334th#92
Passing
Off0.6187th#19
Def-0.0292nd#12

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.82#100
2nd-level / open-field
0.83 / 1.26
Power / stuff (off)
50.0% / 21.7%
Havoc — total (def)
18.6%#44
Havoc — front 7 / DB
12.1% / 6.4%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.26
Def-0.03
Pass downs
Off0.59
Def0.19

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.30#170.17#820.86#25
Defense-0.28#160.14#710.44#81

Elo Trajectory

Ball StateFinal
Elo rating 19251983+58 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.6797th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.2491st
  • Offense success rate56%80th
  • Defense success rate allowed21%94th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs65%91st
  • Offense success — passing downs32%45th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs26%89th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs14%88th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.481st
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.336th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.495th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.947th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.363rd
  • Defense line yards allowed1.296th
  • Offense highlight yards3.495th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.3271st
  • Offense power success0.7550th
  • Defense power success allowed0.0099th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1840th
  • Defense stuff rate0.3289th

Third down

  • Third down conversion50%66th
  • Third down distance faced8.115th
  • Third down conversion allowed21%83rd
  • Third down distance forced9.085th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.3786th
  • Net success rate — second half0.3490th

Drives

  • Points per drive4.793rd
  • Points per drive allowed0.2791st
  • Average starting field position2422nd
  • Opponent starting field position2941st
  • Available yards gained71%87th
  • Available yards allowed19%96th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive92%79th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed73%68th
  • Points per scoring opportunity5.192nd
  • Points allowed per opportunity0.3895th
  • Three-and-out rate17%75th
  • Three-and-outs forced55%93rd

Roster

  • Returning usage71%85th
  • Returning EPA35699th
  • Team talent composite96497th
  • Recruiting class rank4.098th
  • Recruiting class points30198th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.355#29 · above avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.612#19
Rush EPA/play
+0.019#108
Explosiveness
1.357#41
Pts/opportunity
4.14#68
Success rate
48.1%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.593 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.044#48 · above avg
Havoc rate (total)
18.6%#44
Front-7 havoc
12.1%
DB havoc
6.4%
Big play rate allowed
1.072#25
Success rate allowed
39.5%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

39.5 PPG offense, 13.5 allowed — +26.0 margin/game
Points per game
39.5
Points allowed/game
13.5
Scoring margin/game
+26.0
Turnover margin
+1won 3 · lost 2
Production returning
68%
Talent rank (247)
#5

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE80thEXPLOSIVENESS71thFINISHING51thFIELD POS63thDEFENSE66thHAVOC69th50th100th
Offense
80th
Explosiveness
71th
Finishing
51th
Field Pos
63th
Defense
66th
Havoc
69th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+33.9
#1
Offense
+15.1
#3
Defense
-18.8
#2
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 12 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive4.670.27
Starting field positionown 23.8own 29.4
Available yards71.3%18.6%
Scoring opportunities91.7%72.7%
Points per opportunity5.090.38
Three-and-out rate16.7%54.5%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
64.3%
Expected, given the spots
51.7%
Over expected
+12.6
Fourth down vs peers
+17
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Ohio State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Ohio State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Arizona StateSP+ +8.7
Off EPA/play +0.348Def EPA/play +0.057Elo 1572
Match
99%
MissouriSP+ +12.9
Off EPA/play +0.319Def EPA/play +0.020Elo 1703
Match
97%
KansasSP+ +7.5
Off EPA/play +0.310Def EPA/play +0.066Elo 1473
Match
97%
Penn StateSP+ +19.8
Off EPA/play +0.409Def EPA/play +0.049Elo 1891
Match
97%
UTSASP+ +2.9
Off EPA/play +0.302Def EPA/play +0.053Elo 1522
Match
97%
ColoradoSP+ +2.1
Off EPA/play +0.302Def EPA/play +0.032Elo 1406
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +26.0, #4 of 1282016: +28.9, #6 of 1282017: +36.2, #4 of 1302018: +19.0, #10 of 1302019: +49.6, #2 of 1302020: +21.5, #6 of 1242021: +34.8, #3 of 1302022: +33.7, #2 of 1312023: +36.4, #2 of 1332024: +43.5, #1 of 1342025: +39.2, #1 of 1362026: +33.9, #1 of 138
20152026
Now +33.9 · #1 of 138Best +49.6 in 2019Worst +19.0 in 2018

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
202512-29-0
86%
12.0-0.0
202414-27-2
88%
15.2-1.2
202311-28-1
85%
10.1+0.9
202211-28-1
85%
9.8+1.2
202111-28-1
85%
9.9+1.1
20207-16-0
88%
6.9+0.1
201913-110-0
93%
13.3-0.3
201813-19-1
93%
10.3+2.7
201712-29-1
86%
11.5+0.5

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

70%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 10.3-2.3. Top-four bye in 42%. Wins the Big Ten in 36%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
100%
1 loss
99%
2 losses
49%
3 losses
0.7%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

down 5.6 points since preseasonwon 56-3 over Ball State against an expected margin of +60, so 7.2 against the number.

  • At 3 losses they are 49% where the average Big Ten team is 11%.
  • The Big Ten takes 3.19 bids in an average season, and four or more in 37%.

Ohio State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4vs Illinois42.4
  • wk11vs Northwestern42.3
  • wk6vs Maryland40.9
  • wk13vs Michigan40.0
  • wk12at Nebraska39.0
  • wk5at Iowa37.9

Who to root for

Games Ohio State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Mississippi State over Texas3.0
  • wk7Kent State over South Florida2.9
  • wk8Illinois over Oregon2.7
  • wk6UCLA over Oregon2.6
  • wk4Northwestern over Indiana2.6
  • wk6Nebraska over Indiana2.4
The full playoff picture →

Big Ten

0-0 in league play, projected 7.4-1.61 of 18 by title odds
36%
Wins the Big Ten
52%
Reaches the title game

The Big Ten sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 50% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk7Ohio State at Indiana35.8
  • wk10Oregon at Ohio State35.0
  • wk5Ohio State at Iowa29.9
  • wk4Illinois at Ohio State27.9

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Big Ten race →

If not the playoff, then

99%
Bowl eligible
29%
Placed in a bowl
70%
In the playoff
0.9%
Season over in November

Ohio State is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Citrus Bowl8.2%
  • ReliaQuest Bowl6.0%
  • Music City Bowl4.5%
  • Las Vegas Bowl3.7%
  • Pinstripe Bowl2.3%
  • Rate Bowl1.6%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 15 have sent Ohio State a player since 2010 — 56 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Ohio State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
GlenvilleOH122
IMG AcademyFL70
WayneOH61
St. IgnatiusOH42
WashingtonOH32
Bergen CatholicNJ31
Lake TravisTX31
Pickerington CentralOH31
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.