Skip to content

Ball State vs Ohio State Prediction, Picks & Odds — Sep 5, 2026

Ohio State -50.8, and a 0% Cover Chance the Simulation Doesn't Support

The published margin bins account for 73.3% of 40,000 simulations and stop at 49 points; the 80% interval reaches 57, and a cover needs 51. In the 101 FBS games priced between 47.3 and 54.3 since 2014, favorites covered 41.6% of the time.

The Film Room
Matchups ·
10 min read
This game has been played
Final: Ball State 3, Ohio State 56

What follows is the preview as it was published before kickoff — unedited.

Box score, drives and the model's numbers →
Ohio State 100%
Projected favorite
to win
5–45
Projected score
Ball State–Ohio State
50
Projected total
line 56 · under 42%
1%
One-score game
decided by ≤3: 0%

Ohio State is a 50.8-point favorite over Ball State — Bovada and DraftKings, quoted between 51 and 50.5 — and our cover table reports the favorite covering 0% of the time. Our own simulation does not support a zero. The published margin histogram runs in seven-point bins that stop at 42-to-49, and those thirteen bins sum to 73.3%, leaving 26.7% of the 40,000 simulated games above 49 points. The 80% interval for the Ohio State margin runs from 23 to 57. A cover needs 51. That sits inside the interval, not outside the distribution.

Every way the game could go
0%
-38
0%
-32
0%
-24
0%
-18
0%
-10
0%
-4
1%
+4
2%
+10
5%
+18
10%
+24
16%
+32
20%
+38
19%
+46
Ball State winsOhio State wins
Market: Ohio State −51Projected: Ohio State by 40 (100%)

The range of outcomes for this game. Each bar is how often the final margin lands in that range — the more it leans toward Ohio State, the more likely Ohio State wins.

The rest of the simulation is internally consistent: mean and median margin both 40.0, a one-score game 1.0% of the time, a 20-plus blowout 93.7%, most likely final Ohio State 45, Ball State 0. Against 50.8 that is a 10.8-point disagreement, and the honest reading of the favorite's cover chance is small, not absent — the difference between a bet with bad odds and a bet with none.

Keys to the coverHow likely
▸ For Ohio State to cover -50.8~0% to cover
Score on nearly every possession — a top points-per-chance day, not just big playscoin-flip-ish
Break the methodical mold — chunk scores, not just long drivesunlikely
Win the turnover battle by 2+ — short fields are the fast path past 50.8coin-flip-ish
Bury the dog early — no slow start that keeps it a one-score game into the third quarterlean yes
▸ For Ball State +50.8~100% to cover
Shorten the game — bleed clock and hold possessions downunlikely
Force a low-scoring, low-variance game — kill the favorite's extra possessionslikely
Win or tie the turnover battle — no gift-wrapped short fieldslean yes
Steal a possession — cash a fourth-down or special-teams play for an extra driveunlikely
What each side needs to beat the number, and how achievable it is. Edge to Ball State +50.8: our projection has the favorite covering only 0% of the time — a methodical favorite that lands 11 points short of the number, with the dog's keep-it-close criteria (clock control, even turnovers) more achievable than the favorite's blowout stack.

What favorites have done at this Price

In the 101 FBS games since 2014 that closed between 47.3 and 54.3, favorites averaged 49.2 points of margin with a median of 48 — 2.8 short of this number — covered 41.6% of the time and cleared 51 points of margin in 40.6%. No underdog won outright and only 1.0% finished within one score. The wider 45-and-up cohort (n=181) reads the same: median margin 47, covers 41.4%, 51-plus margin 38.1%. That group's margins ran 28 at the 10th percentile to 66 at the 90th — and our 40 is its 25th percentile.

Ohio State has laid a number near this one before. Of the 15 FBS games since 2014 priced at 47 or more, it laid three: Rutgers in 2019 at 52.4, won by 35; Akron in 2021 at 48.25, won by 52; Akron in 2024 at 49.5, won by 46. Across the 30 games since 2014 in which it was favored by 30 or more, Ohio State averaged 51.5 points, allowed 11.6, won by a mean 39.9 with five shutouts, and covered exactly 50.0%. Only three of those 30 were priced at 47 or more — a record at big numbers, not a forecast.

What the projection is built from

What separates Ohio State and Ball State
Ball StatefavorsOhio State
Last season's body of worklast year's power rating, regressed toward the averageOhio State +25
Returning productionhow much of last year's production is back this seasonOhio State +6
Roster talentoverall talent level of the roster — recruiting pedigree plus an independent preseason roster gradeOhio State +6
Transfer portalnet proven talent gained vs lost in transfers — it raises or lowers a roster's projected strengthBall State +3
Quarterbackthe projected starter's quality and how settled the job isOhio State +3

Each ingredient of our projection and the side it favors — bars toward Ohio State are why it's the pick (home field is counted separately).

Of the 40 points, 24.84 come from one component: last season's body of work, the regressed prior-year power rating. Home field adds 4.5, returning production 5.83, talent 5.36, quarterback 2.62. Only two components point the other way: skill transfers at 0.02, and the portal, worth 3.13 toward Ball State. The projection is an inheritance from 2025 — and the 2025 it inherits is the third-stingiest scoring defense in the database since 2002.

Ohio State allowed 9.3 points a game and ranked third nationally on defense. Among 2,910 FBS team-seasons since 2002, only three allowed fewer than 9.5: Alabama 2011 at 8.15, USC 2008 at 9.00 and Ohio State 2025 at 9.29. That defense is largely gone — pass-defense continuity 29%, rush-defense 27%. The five listed departures — Caden Curry, Arvell Reese, Mitchell Melton, Davison Igbinosun and Sonny Styles — sum to 102.8 impact points against 43.8 for the five returners, and Curry's 11.0 sacks alone were a third of the team's 33.0.

PlayerLast seasonGIQ
Ball StateAmeir Glenn (DT)13 tkl, 1.0 sacks74
Ball StateBen Marsh (DE)8 tkl, 0.5 sacks71
Ball StateDeondre Shepherd (DB)13 tkl68
Ohio StateKenyatta Jackson Jr. (DE)27 tkl, 6.5 sacks, 2 PD93
Ohio StateJermaine Mathews Jr. (CB)20 tkl, 1.0 sacks, 2 PD, 2 INT81
Ohio StateJaylen McClain (S)50 tkl, 3 PD79
Returning defensive production — the disruptors who are back (GIQ = our 0–99 player rating)

Across 51 top-five scoring defenses from 2014 through 2024, points allowed rose the next season from 14.9 to 19.9 per game, 90.2% getting worse. The opener is the wrong place to look for that decline: those same defenses allowed 13.0 points in the next season's first game, median 10, holding it to 10 or fewer 51.0% of the time. Ohio State's offensive churn is in the backfield, not up front: all five projected line starters are holdovers, while three backs holding 16%, 16% and 15% of last season's rushing production are gone from a run game that ranked 84th.

PlayerLast season → now
Ball StateQua Ashley (RB)36% of carries → nan
Ball StateQian Magwood (WR)14% of targets → NFL/graduated
Ball StateNathan Voorhis (EDGE)49 tkl, 12.0 sacks → NFL/graduated
Ball StateWillizhuan Yates (DB)34 tkl, 1 INT → nan
Ohio StateCarnell Tate (WR)19% of targets → NFL/graduated
Ohio StateIsaiah West (RB)17% of carries → NFL/graduated
Ohio StateCaden Curry (EDGE)60 tkl, 11.0 sacks → NFL/graduated
Ohio StateArvell Reese (LB)62 tkl, 6.5 sacks → NFL/graduated
Key departures — the production each side has to replace (and where it went)

Ball State returns 5.7% of its production

Against Ohio State's 68.3%, Ball State returns 5.7% of last season's production, and its rushing continuity is zero. Quarterback Kiael Kelly held 51% of the passing production and 17% of the rushing, running back Qua Ashley 33% of the rushing; receivers Qian Magwood and Eric Weatherly are gone, and Ty Robinson transferred to Illinois. The unit ranks — 134th overall on offense, 136th in pass offense on opponent-adjusted PPA — belong to those players, as does the 15.8 points a game Ball State averaged. On defense, the five returners combine for 6.1 impact points against 75.6 for the five who left, and departed edge Nathan Voorhis had 12 of the team's 23 sacks.

Pass offenseRush offensePass defenseRush defense
Ball State#136#111#91#99
Ohio State#2#84#5#3
Last season's units, ranked nationally (opponent-adjusted PPA). These ranks belong to last year's rosters: Ball State returns 16% of last season's passing production and 0% of its rushing production. Ohio State returns 72% of last season's passing production and 55% of its rushing production.

The quarterback is the sharpest version of the gap. Keldric Luster, a Texas State transfer, has no FBS seasons and a career line of 4-of-12 for 37 yards. He was named the starter on Aug. 23, ending a camp battle with fellow transfer Tyler Mizzell of Concord, a Division II program, and makes his first career start in Ohio Stadium. Our player values book the position at minus-1.2 for Ball State against plus-3.0 for Julian Sayin, who returns with a 96 rating; the spread decomposition scores the slot separately, 1.87 to minus-0.75.

Likely starterWhy we project himGIQ
Ball StateKeldric Luster (from Texas State)Transfer — limited college production, no FBS snaps yet
Ohio StateJulian Sayin (returning)Returning starter — highly productive96
Projected starting quarterbacks (GIQ = our 0–99 player rating)

The closest-fitting cohort still lands short of the number. In the 30 FBS games since 2014 with a Mid-American underdog of 35 or more, the dog averaged 6.5 points (median 6), was scoreless at the break in half the sample and held to seven or fewer in 70%. The favorite cleared 50 points 60% of the time. None won; the closest margin was 17 — but the mean margin was 46.7 and the median 48, under 50.8, not over it. Ball State's own version is starker: 0-16 against power-conference opponents since 2014 at 13.1 points a game, and 10, 3, 0 and 3 points in its four largest-spread games, against Tennessee, Georgia, Miami and Auburn.

What the first quarter has been worth

Among 193 non-neutral home favorites of 35 or more since 2013, the favorite led 29.2 to 4.4 at halftime and was up 21 or more at the break 67.9% of the time. Split the sample and the early script carries information: the 112 favorites that scored 14-plus in the opening quarter won by a mean 43.8 and reached a 50-plus margin 33.0% of the time, while the 78 games with a first-quarter margin of seven or less finished at a mean 34.9 with 50-plus in 15.4%. Those are conditional averages, not decided outcomes — and even the strong-start branch lands seven points shy of this number.

The total, and the position we take

Both books are on 56.5, no dispersion. We project 50.1 combined points, median 50, an 80% range of 34 to 67; 42.6% of the simulations finish under 48 and 34.6% under 45 — thresholds, not a price. The market's own history says 56.5 is set low for a spread this size: of the 92 games since 2014 with a 47-plus closing spread, the median total was 60.5 and only 19 carried a total of 57 or lower. Separately, 41.5% of the 193 comparable games since 2013 finished under 56.5 actual points, while in the 45-plus cohort (n=181, average closing total 60.7) the under cashed against each game's own, higher number just 27.1% of the time — two different questions, not one.

SpreadWe project Ohio State by 40; the market is wider at 51, so the value is the points with Ball State. A preseason caveat, honestly: this early, the market has genuinely better information than any projection built on last season's rosters — returning-production and depth-chart data aren't fully published yet. Our number is on the record; treat the gap as a disagreement to track, not an edge to bet.
TotalNo validated lean. We project 50 combined points against a 56 line, but our totals projection doesn't yet have a graded track record, so we don't publish a lean on it.
Key numbersThe margin lands exactly on 3 about 0% of the time and on 7 about 0% — the two numbers that decide the most bets.
Betting angle

The portal is the one component of the projection that points at Ball State by more than a rounding error. Ohio State took 17 transfers in and lost 37, a net of minus-47 stars: four-star receivers Mylan Graham and Quincy Porter to Notre Dame, safety Faheem Delane to LSU. One of those departures, three-star corner Diante Griffin, landed at Ball State and is its projected right cornerback. Ball State's ledger is 24 in, 18 out, plus 23 stars.

AddedLostNet starsKey departures/adds
Ball State2418+23Eric McClain (CB); Roman Pearson (CB)
Ohio State1737-47Mylan Graham (WR); Quincy Porter (WR)
Transfer portal — roster turnover into the season

The bettor's version is narrow. Our projection is 40 and the market is 50.8, but this is a preseason number built on last year's rosters, and the market has better roster information in August than any model does — we publish the gap as a disagreement to track, not an edge. What the price asks is whether a favorite that ranked 128th of 136 in offensive explosiveness, fifth in points per scoring chance, and is replacing roughly three-quarters of its defensive production can post a 51-point margin. In the 101 games priced at this band, 41.6% of favorites did. Our distribution says less than that, and more than zero.

Frequently asked questions

Who is predicted to win Ball State vs Ohio State?
Our projection favors Ohio State with a 100% win probability. The projected final score is Ohio State 45–Ball State 5.
What is the predicted score for Ball State vs Ohio State?
We project Ohio State 45–Ball State 5, a combined 50 points.
What is the spread for Ball State vs Ohio State, and which side does the model like?
The betting line is Ohio State −50.8. Our projection has Ohio State winning by about 40, inside the number — the points are the value side.

Discussion

Weigh in on the analysis — the best takes rise to the top.

0 Replies

Sign in to join the discussion.