Skip to content
Sedrick Alexander
Sedrick Alexander

#28Sedrick Alexander

RB·Vanderbilt·20251.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Sedrick Alexander is a Explosive Back for Vanderbilt. Sedrick's 2025 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 125 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sedrick Alexander's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
570 Rush yards11 Rush TD106 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions200 Rec yards4 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume45
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency67
  • Receiving64
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (88th percentile).
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.59 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.25 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Georgia State (SP+ -25).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2501.25Wk 1 vs Charleston Southern: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia Tech: +0.63 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Carolina: +0.58 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia State: +1.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah State: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Alabama: +1.19 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs LSU: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Missouri: -0.24 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas: -0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Auburn: +0.38 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Kentucky: +0.26 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tennessee: +0.85 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCharleston SouthernW45-312836.9012610.54
2@Virginia TechW44-20-10.110737.320.63
3@South CarolinaW31-75.913413.2122610.58
4vsGeorgia StateW70-21-24.53134.3111011.25
5vsUtah StateW55-35-3.18334.101500.26
6@AlabamaL14-3014.847619.0132211.19
8vsLSUW31-2410.314453.2121600.18
9vsMissouriW17-1014.410272.70-0.24
10@TexasL31-3416.25112.20110-0.49
11vsAuburnW45-3811.610393.9211300.38
13vsKentuckyW45-171.8471.8045900.26
14@TennesseeW45-2415.01011511.530300.85
20vsIowaL27-3419.7372.303190

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.7%
Passing plays
5.5%
Rushing plays
26.8%
Standard downs
17.7%
Passing downs
10.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.62
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.420−0.67
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.