Skip to content
Saquon Barkley

#26Saquon Barkley

RB·Penn State·201720165.2 pts line value1st Round

Saquon Barkley is a 2-year Pass-Catching Back for Penn State. Saquon's 2017 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 266 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Saquon Barkley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1271 Rush yards18 Rush TD217 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
54 Receptions632 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.7 Yards/rec
Returns
15 Kick returns426 KR yards2 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency72
  • Receiving81
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (78th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.92 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Nebraska (SP+ 3).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
LeVante BellamyWestern Michigan0.4005.4107.6
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Blake CorumMichigan0.3805.1107.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9200.92Wk 1 vs Akron: +0.66 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: +0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +0.63 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Iowa: +0.29 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Indiana: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northwestern: -0.02 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Michigan: +0.24 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: -0.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan State: +0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Rutgers: -0.00 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Nebraska: +0.92 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Maryland: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Washington: +0.34 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAkronW52-0-17.61417212.3235400.66
2vsPittsburghW33-146.014886.3144510.23
3vsGeorgia StateW56-0-14.010474.70414210.63
4@IowaW21-199.8282117.51129400.29
5vsIndianaW45-1410.220562.8045100.15
6@NorthwesternW31-711.216754.72290-0.02
8vsMichiganW42-1319.6151087.2235310.24
9@Ohio StateL38-3930.921442.114230-0.11
10@Michigan StateL24-2713.814634.5033300.38
11vsRutgersW35-6-5.514352.521200-0.00
12vsNebraskaW56-442.5171589.3366600.92
13@MarylandW66-3-4.516774.821400.23
1vsWashingtonW35-2822.1181377.6273800.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.0%
Passing plays
13.8%
Rushing plays
51.4%
Standard downs
34.3%
Passing downs
23.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.72
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.512017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Penn State
3.9
97.9
2017Penn State
5.2
98.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.