Skip to content
Ryquell Armstead
Ryquell Armstead

#7Ryquell Armstead

RB·Temple·201820162.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Ryquell Armstead is a 2-year Explosive Back for Temple. Ryquell's 2016 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 158 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ryquell Armstead's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
919 Rush yards14 Rush TD156 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions41 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume51
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency31
  • Receiving15
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency31th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Charlotte (SP+ -21).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 1 vs Army: +0.11 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Stony Brook: +0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Penn State: -0.71 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Charlotte: +0.81 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs SMU: +0.64 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Memphis: -0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Florida: +0.53 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Cincinnati: +0.14 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UConn: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs East Carolina: +0.33 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Navy: +0.64 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Wake Forest: -0.53 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsArmyL13-28-9.916774.810.11
2vsStony BrookW38-014483.410.04
3@Penn StateL27-3419.02-4-2.00120-0.71
4vsCharlotteW48-20-20.95336.6221300.81
5vsSMUW45-20-10.81515910.620.64
6@MemphisL27-347.75122.41-0.08
7@UCFW26-25-2.214785.600.14
8vsSouth FloridaW46-309.82021010.520.53
9vsCincinnatiW34-13-3.618613.420.14
10@UConnW21-0-11.6201336.700.33
13vsEast CarolinaW37-10-9.010353.520.33
14@NavyW34-106.810767.6111900.64
1vsWake ForestL26-34-0.6710.10170-0.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.8%
Passing plays
1.5%
Rushing plays
31.8%
Standard downs
22.7%
Passing downs
8.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.21
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.960−0.862018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Temple
2.9
63.6
2018Temple
2.9
66.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.