Skip to content

Temple Owls

American Athletic·1-1·
Elo
1312#114
SP+
-4.9#84
FPI
-7.3
AP
NR
Next@ Toledo · Wk 3Win prob 39%Model +4.8
Talent #80 (631.1)Recruiting class #6837% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Temple

All news

Temple's run game has nowhere to go

Matchup · 6d ago

Keveun Mason ran for 158 yards and Temple did not need much else

Matchup · Sep 6

Roster · 119 players

FR 30SO 19JR 22SR 48
#PlayerPosClHtWt
11Camren BoykinQBSO6'2"190
13Ajani SheppardQBSR6'2"230
14Jaxon SmolikQBJR6'1"205
15Brody NormanQBFR6'0"190
16Brady PalmerQBFR6'2"215
19Lamar BestQBFR6'0"175
20R.J. BlountRBFR5'11"205
21De'Carlos YoungRBSO5'11"210
22Johnny MartinRBSR5'10"200
23Jordan MillerRBJR5'7"185
25Ameir MorrowRBFR5'11"210
26Keveun MasonRBSO5'10"190
27Samuel Brown VRBSR6'1"215
29Hunter SmithRBSR5'11"190
1Colin ChaseWRSR6'0"195
10Jayce FreemanWRSR6'4"225
12Demonte GreeneWRSR6'1"180
17JoJo BermudezWRSR5'9"170
24Ash RobertsWRFR5'10"160
28Zander BaptisteWRSO6'4"185
80Hunter WatsonWRFR6'1"180
81Coen LoganWRFR6'1"205
82Tylik MitchellWRSO5'11"185
83Kenedy UzomaWRSO6'5"210
85Rameir HardyWRSO6'2"185
86Reis StocksdaleWRSR5'10"185
87Kaegan ChambersWRSO5'11"170
18Joey SchlafferTESR6'5"250
30Liam FullerTEFR6'6"230
33Ryder KuschTESO6'4"250
40David WiseTEJR6'5"230
44Patrick KellerTESR6'4"205
84Daniel EvertTEJR6'5"250
88Peter ClarkeTESR6'6"265
51Mausa PaluOLSR6'4"335
52Eric KingOLSR6'3"300
53Khalif McnearOLFR6'2"290
54Jackson PruittOLSR6'5"315
55Kevin TerryOLSR6'5"280
56C.J. Van BurenOLSR6'3"290
57Grayson MainsOLSR6'5"300
58Logan KingOLFR6'3"295
63John WatkinsOLFR6'5"300
65Billy BrownOLSO6'4"315
66Aiden ZilkerOLFR6'5"300
70Zach AamlandOLSR6'7"300
71Giakoby HillsOLJR6'5"290
73Karon SpencerOLFR6'6"310
74Davray VenuOLJR6'5"295
75Luke WatsonOLSR6'5"290
76John StoneOLSR6'2"300
77Ransom McDermottOLJR6'8"315
79Jonah TarpleyOLFR6'5"300
34Brandon EnarusaiDLSR6'3"265
48Adriano McLeanDLSO6'6"230
51Antwuan RogersDLFR6'5"245
52Russell Sykes IVDLJR6'3"260
58Kaleb ArtisDLSR6'4"315
59Deshon DodsonDLSO6'3"270
71Kechan MillerDLFR6'2"300
88Lamar FairfaxDLSO6'1"270
89Jayden BrownDLFR6'4"245
90Yamael WigginsDLSR6'2"240
92Jude OkelekeDLFR6'2"300
93Kevin Hornbeak Jr.DLSR6'2"295
94Quante GilliansDLSO6'3"290
95Troy CunninghamDLSO6'3"265
96Semi OdedeleDLJR6'4"320
97Davier BishopDLSR6'5"260
98Joseph AuzenneDLSR6'1"295
99Cameron JonesDLJR6'5"250
10Jaylon JosephLBSR6'2"235
12Willy LoveLBJR6'3"215
15Jordan MontgomeryLBSR6'2"230
22Eric StuartLBSR6'2"215
28David KpegloLBSR6'2"230
30Jayvant BrownLBSR6'0"220
33Curly OrdonezLBSR6'1"220
36Wesley BrownLBJR6'2"210
40Brendan FarhatLBFR6'2"210
43Aiden BrittonLBJR5'11"215
44Tyree AlualuLBJR6'0"230
50Brian AdderleyLBSO6'2"245
53Reggie JonesLBSR6'2"235
54Josh NengiteLBFR6'4"210
55Uyi IgiehonLBFR6'5"225
56JaMair DiazLBSR6'1"245
57Michael Holcomb Jr.LBFR6'3"250
11Earl KulpCBJR6'0"190
13Denzel ChavisCBJR6'0"185
14Nakeel LawrenceCBSR6'1"190
20Jett WhiteCBSO6'2"175
21Asa LocksCBJR6'0"185
27Devontae Ward-GrantCBSO5'11"165
31Bryson GoodwinCBJR6'2"180
32Adrian LaingCBJR6'1"180
35Dylan AbramCBFR6'0"170
49Eyan SteadCBFR5'9"155
16Pooh LawtonSSR5'11"175
17Jaeden GouldSSR6'2"210
18Kolin DinkinsSSR6'2"200
19Josiah JacksonSSR6'1"195
23Zyil PowellSSR6'1"195
24Saboor KarriemSSR6'3"210
25Orel GraySSR5'11"195
29Avery PowellSSR5'10"170
37Demacio CooperSJR6'3"180
38Alex HanksSFR6'2"195
39Daron HarrisSFR6'1"180
41Jack PaesslerSJR5'11"170
42Jamarcus PierreSSO5'10"180
46James PaesslerSSR5'11"170
32Darren WuPKSR5'9"160
90Luke CochranePKFR5'10"185
98Carl HardinPKSR5'9"160
7Dante AttonPSR6'0"200
91Luke SwordPFR6'3"175
46Michael PerilloLSFR5'10"200
97Sam WolfendenLSJR6'2"245

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
23.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
20.5
scoring defense
Differential
+3.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
326.0#114
Yards / play
5.6#92
Passing yards / game
124.5#130
Rushing yards / game
201.5#41
First downs / game
16.5#115
3rd down %
29.2%#127
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
31:03#58
Defense
Yards allowed / game
354.0#86
Yards / play allowed
5.8#108
Pass yards allowed / game
231.5#99
Rush yards allowed / game
122.5#76
3rd down % allowed
46.2%#116
Sacks
3#80
Tackles for loss
7#111
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#41
Takeaways
3#46
Giveaways
2#47
Penalties / game
4.0#17
Penalty yards / game
40.0#31

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Temple is in year 2 under K.C. Keeler. The way in is 132nd at holding the line of scrimmage, and they are 130th at shutting down the ground game.

Temple has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected soft spots

  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #132
    projected
  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #130
    projected
  • Defenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #128
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
5.86.2
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
4.8
of 10 games
Bowl odds
59%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
86%
vs Charlotte
Toughest
25%
vs South Florida

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 6-6 (27%)Bowl eligible 59% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBJaxon Smolik, Ajani Sheppard
+9.9 EPA
RBHunter Smith, De'Carlos Young +1
+9.6 EPA
WRJovanni Bermudez, Jayce Freeman +2
+4.9 EPA
TERyder Kusch
+1.1 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBJaxon Smolik
~$500K
EPA +4.50.141/play32 snaps
RBKeveun Mason
~$263K
EPA +13.70.381/play36 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1946th#75
Def0.1149th#71
Explosiveness
Off1.1526th#102
Def1.2940th#83
Field position
Off75.393rd#11
Def73.340th#83
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.7839th#84
Def3.1555th#63
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 2
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.038th#127
Off · rush
0.2877th#32

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.2877th#32
Def0.0351st#68
Passing
Off0.039th#126
Def0.1953rd#66

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.21#48
2nd-level / open-field
1.13 / 2.08
Power / stuff (off)
88.9% / 16.1%
Havoc — total (def)
14.3%#95
Havoc — front 7 / DB
7.1% / 7.1%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.11
Def0.01
Pass downs
Off0.39
Def0.31

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.13#590.32#520.18#124
Defense-0.13#420.06#540.78#120

Elo Trajectory

Rhode IslandFinal
Elo rating 13121323+11 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.1740th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.0949th
  • Offense success rate44%45th
  • Defense success rate allowed41%34th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs49%50th
  • Offense success — passing downs31%41st
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs45%42nd
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs33%25th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.128th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.262nd
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.9328th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.944th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.151st
  • Defense line yards allowed2.185th
  • Offense highlight yards1.774th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.4473rd
  • Offense power success0.8370th
  • Defense power success allowed0.7345th
  • Offense stuff rate0.2028th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1835th

Third down

  • Third down conversion30%8th
  • Third down distance faced6.367th
  • Third down conversion allowed46%20th
  • Third down distance forced6.834th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.0753rd
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0031st

Drives

  • Points per drive1.324th
  • Points per drive allowed3.421st
  • Average starting field position181st
  • Opponent starting field position3613th
  • Available yards gained40%29th
  • Available yards allowed76%7th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive63%11th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%12th
  • Points per scoring opportunity2.029th
  • Points allowed per opportunity3.432nd
  • Three-and-out rate25%46th
  • Three-and-outs forced13%20th

Roster

  • Returning usage29%34th
  • Returning EPA96.147th
  • Team talent composite63142nd
  • Recruiting class rank68.051st
  • Recruiting class points19251st

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.194#75 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.035#126
Rush EPA/play
+0.278#32
Explosiveness
1.149#102
Pts/opportunity
3.78#84
Success rate
45.1%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.243 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.112#71 · average
Havoc rate (total)
14.3%#95
Front-7 havoc
7.1%
DB havoc
7.1%
Big play rate allowed
1.292#83
Success rate allowed
40.2%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

Points per game
23.5
Points allowed/game
20.5
Scoring margin/game
+3.0
Turnover margin
+1won 3 · lost 2
Production returning
37%
Talent rank (247)
#80

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE46thEXPLOSIVENESS26thFINISHING39thFIELD POS93thDEFENSE49thHAVOC31th50th100th
Offense
46th
Explosiveness
26th
Finishing
39th
Field Pos
93th
Defense
49th
Havoc
31th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-3.5
#82
Offense
-3.0
#89
Defense
+0.5
#72
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 8 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.253.38
Starting field positionown 17.8own 35.5
Available yards40.4%76.4%
Scoring opportunities62.5%100.0%
Points per opportunity2.003.38
Three-and-out rate25.0%12.5%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
40.9%
Expected, given the spots
47.3%
Over expected
-6.4
Fourth down vs peers
-30
Fourth down vs the model
-33
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Temple is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Temple in 2026

by EPA/play distance
San José StateSP+ -12.8
Off EPA/play +0.184Def EPA/play +0.135Elo 1413
Match
99%
TulaneSP+ -7.4
Off EPA/play +0.200Def EPA/play +0.138Elo 1529
Match
98%
Texas TechSP+ +18.9
Off EPA/play +0.221Def EPA/play +0.125Elo 1870
Match
98%
Jacksonville StateSP+ -7.0
Off EPA/play +0.175Def EPA/play +0.080Elo 1432
Match
98%
Kent StateSP+ -27.5
Off EPA/play +0.164Def EPA/play +0.089Elo 1056
Match
98%
NevadaSP+ -6.1
Off EPA/play +0.190Def EPA/play +0.069Elo 1462
Match
98%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +8.6, #38 of 1282016: +6.8, #40 of 1282017: -2.3, #68 of 1302018: +4.8, #45 of 1302019: +2.2, #52 of 1302020: -26.9, #122 of 1242021: -27.9, #124 of 1302022: -10.2, #100 of 1312023: -24.0, #130 of 1332024: -22.5, #127 of 1342025: -11.9, #100 of 1362026: -3.5, #82 of 138
20152026
Now -3.5 · #82 of 138Best +8.6 in 2015Worst -27.9 in 2021

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.1-0.1
20255-73-5
42%
5.1-0.1
20243-92-6
25%
2.5+0.5
20233-91-7
25%
2.8+0.2
20223-91-7
25%
4.4-1.4
20213-91-7
25%
2.1+0.9
20201-61-6
14%
1.0+0.0
20198-55-3
62%
8.1-0.1
20188-57-1
62%
7.2+0.8
20177-64-4
54%
7.1-0.1

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.6%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 6.3-5.8. Wins the American Athletic in 4.1%.

If they finish with…

64%
1 loss
9.6%
2 losses
0.0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 1.

Win out and it is 64%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 0.1 points since preseason.

  • At 1 loss they are 64% where the average American Athletic team is 52%.
  • The American Athletic takes 0.27 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.6% of seasons, having won their league in 98% of those.

Temple’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk13at Memphis2.0
  • wk5at South Florida1.8
  • wk10at Navy1.7
  • wk9at East Carolina1.3
  • wk4vs Army1.2
  • wk3at Toledo1.2

Who to root for

Games Temple is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk5Utah State over Boise State0.4
  • wk13Georgia over Georgia Tech0.3
  • wk7UL Monroe over Louisiana Tech0.3
  • wk12Wyoming over New Mexico0.3
  • wk11Rutgers over Nebraska0.3
  • wk3Arkansas over Georgia0.3
The full playoff picture →

American Athletic

0-0 in league play, projected 4.1-3.910 of 14 by title odds
4.1%
Wins the American Athletic
9.5%
Reaches the title game

The American Athletic sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 40% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk13Temple at Memphis10.5
  • wk5Temple at South Florida9.6
  • wk10Temple at Navy8.4
  • wk9Temple at East Carolina7.2

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole American Athletic race →

If not the playoff, then

65%
Bowl eligible
50%
Placed in a bowl
0.6%
In the playoff
50%
Season over in November

Temple is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 14% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Armed Forces Bowl8.4%
  • Fenway Bowl7.3%
  • Birmingham Bowl6.7%
  • Gasparilla Bowl5.6%
  • Military Bowl5.3%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl4.5%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 11 have sent Temple a player since 2010 — 33 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Temple's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Fork Union Military AcademyVA50
St. Frances AcademyMD50
Archbishop WoodPA30
George WashingtonWV30
LakewoodFL30
Paramus CatholicNJ30
Timber CreekNJ30
Don Bosco PrepNJ21
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.