Skip to content
Spencer Brown

#4Spencer Brown

RB·UAB·202020171.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Spencer Brown is a 2-year Featured Back for UAB. Spencer's 2017 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 234 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Spencer Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2017

2-Star or below
Stars
247 composite
0.7583
National rank
#3,925
High school
Mortimer Jordan
Hometown
Morris, AL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2017 Production

Rushing
1329 Rush yards10 Rush TD250 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions42 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume81
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency55
  • Receiving5
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Rice (SP+ -24).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Alabama A&M: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ball State: +0.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.24 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs North Texas: -0.00 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Charlotte: -0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Southern Miss: +0.23 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rice: +0.85 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTSA: -0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: -0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTEP: +0.04 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Ohio: +0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAlabama A&MW38-77426.010.52
2@Ball StateL31-51-19.7171518.900.56
3vsCoastal CarolinaW30-2316513.220.24
4@North TexasL43-46-4.517502.91-0.00
6vsLouisiana TechW23-22-5.5261686.511200.24
7vsMiddle TennesseeW25-23-4.9311675.410.23
8@CharlotteL24-25-26.116714.402140-0.15
9@Southern MissW30-12-3.4332096.310.23
10vsRiceW52-21-23.6171408.230.85
11@UTSAW24-19-2.5271284.70-0.03
12@FloridaL7-3610.18172.10-0.28
13vsUTEPW28-7-27.422984.500.04
1vsOhioL6-413.313372.8012600.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.5%
Passing plays
0.8%
Rushing plays
48.8%
Standard downs
34.1%
Passing downs
15.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.960−0.392020
EPA per play · 2017 — 2020 · 21 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017UAB
1.9
57.3
2020UAB
1.3
39.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.