Skip to content
Sieh Bangura

#5Sieh Bangura

RB·Ohio·20251.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Sieh Bangura is a Featured Back for Ohio. Sieh's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 253 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sieh Bangura's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1392 Rush yards15 Rush TD240 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions77 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.9 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns141 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume83
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency46
  • Receiving28
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.33 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.51 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5100.51Wk 1 vs Rutgers: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs West Virginia: -0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio State: -0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.45 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Bowling Green: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ball State: -0.28 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Northern Illinois: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.50 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami (OH): +0.26 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Western Michigan: +0.48 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Buffalo: -0.02 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@RutgersL31-341.016865.40150-0.03
2vsWest VirginiaW17-10-6.820663.313160-0.01
3@Ohio StateL9-3730.112242.00-0.41
4vsGardner-WebbW52-35181236.831500.45
5vsBowling GreenW35-20-12.6181156.400.22
6@Ball StateL14-20-23.015674.50150-0.28
8vsNorthern IllinoisW48-21-16.7221476.730.51
9@Eastern MichiganW28-21-14.7181005.6211200.50
11vsMiami (OH)W24-20-3.4171026.0133000.26
12@Western MichiganL13-17-1.416976.111000.48
13vsMassachusettsW42-14-36.6271967.321-200.38
14@BuffaloW31-26-7.5221205.51160-0.02
20vsUNLVW17-104.3191497.81

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.2%
Passing plays
4.5%
Rushing plays
45.3%
Standard downs
32.8%
Passing downs
20.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.11 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.610−0.50
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.