Skip to content
Paul Perkins

#24Paul Perkins

RB·UCLA·201520143.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Paul Perkins is a 2-year Featured Back for UCLA. Paul's 2015 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 266 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Paul Perkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1343 Rush yards14 Rush TD237 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
30 Receptions242 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume81
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency71
  • Receiving51
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UNLV (SP+ -16).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6900.69Wk 1 vs Virginia: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UNLV: +0.69 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs BYU: +0.54 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona: +0.22 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Arizona State: -0.11 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs California: +0.38 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Colorado: +0.59 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oregon State: +0.11 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington State: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Utah: -0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs USC: +0.08 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Nebraska: +0.28 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsVirginiaW34-161.414594.2055800.02
2@UNLVW37-3-16.2181518.4222400.69
3vsBYUW24-238.7262198.410.54
4@ArizonaW56-304.724853.5311700.22
5vsArizona StateL23-3810.218633.511-30-0.11
7@StanfordL35-5622.8141047.4121600.40
8vsCaliforniaW40-2412.111736.6021300.38
9vsColoradoW35-31-4.0121189.8144110.59
10@Oregon StateW41-0-10.123893.910.11
11vsWashington StateL27-314.2201216.1042800.18
12@UtahW17-911.028983.51140-0.07
13@USCL21-4016.817955.6253600.08
1vsNebraskaL29-3711.112685.713800.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.2%
Passing plays
7.9%
Rushing plays
53.3%
Standard downs
33.6%
Passing downs
16.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.780−0.332015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014UCLA
4.6
88.6
2015UCLA
3.9
80.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.