Skip to content
Nicholas Singleton
Nicholas Singleton

#10Nicholas Singleton

RB·Penn State·202420223.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Nicholas Singleton is a 2-year Explosive Back for Penn State. Nicholas's 2022 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 167 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nicholas Singleton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1052 Rush yards12 Rush TD155 Carries6.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions85 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.7 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Kick returns349 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume55
  • Explosiveness76
  • Consistency35
  • Receiving39
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency35th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Utah (SP+ 19).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Purdue: -0.32 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio: +0.72 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Auburn: +0.64 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Central Michigan: -0.14 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northwestern: -0.19 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan: -0.33 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Minnesota: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: -0.32 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Indiana: +0.26 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Maryland: +0.86 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: +0.26 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.96 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@PurdueW35-317.79222.40-0.32
2vsOhioW46-10-4.61017917.921000.72
3@AuburnW41-125.11012412.420.64
4vsCentral MichiganW33-14-14.012423.50100-0.14
5vsNorthwesternW17-7-13.421874.111110-0.19
7@MichiganL17-4132.06193.20-0.33
8vsMinnesotaW45-1716.013796.1222800.29
9vsOhio StateL31-4431.114453.20160-0.32
10@IndianaW45-14-7.116734.610.26
11vsMarylandW30-011.21112211.121500.86
12@RutgersW55-10-9.19626.901500.01
13vsMichigan StateW35-161.217784.6033010.26
1vsUtahW35-2119.2712017.120.96

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.1%
Passing plays
4.1%
Rushing plays
33.3%
Standard downs
23.3%
Passing downs
9.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.04
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.090−0.462024
EPA per play · 2022 — 2024 · 28 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Penn State
3.3
61.6
2024Penn State
3.0
72.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.