Skip to content
Marcus Carroll

#9Marcus Carroll

Marcus Carroll is a Featured Back for Georgia State. Marcus's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 289 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcus Carroll's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1350 Rush yards13 Rush TD274 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
23 Receptions234 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency26
  • Receiving32
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency26th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Rhode Island.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Rhode Island: +0.65 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UConn: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Charlotte: -0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.31 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Troy: +0.56 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Marshall: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Louisiana: -0.05 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia Southern: +0.37 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs James Madison: -0.37 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs App State: -0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs LSU: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Old Dominion: -0.23 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsRhode IslandW42-35231848.032800.65
2vsUConnW35-14-15.6241074.532700.13
3@CharlotteW41-25-21.420673.41100-0.08
4@Coastal CarolinaW30-17-1.2291505.2123600.31
5vsTroyL7-289.819753.9133700.56
7vsMarshallW41-24-9.0281595.711300.10
8@LouisianaW20-170.4261104.202550-0.05
9@Georgia SouthernL27-44-5.2282087.420.37
10vsJames MadisonL14-4211.813332.503300-0.37
11vsApp StateL14-423.8341133.30240-0.18
12@LSUL14-5619.115875.8145100.29
13@Old DominionL24-25-10.115573.80130-0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.2%
Passing plays
6.6%
Rushing plays
61.6%
Standard downs
42.8%
Passing downs
24.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.75 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Marcus Carroll Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Georgia State · Gridpex