Skip to content
Makhi Hughes

#21Makhi Hughes

RB·Tulane·20242.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Makhi Hughes is a Featured Back for Tulane. Makhi's 2024 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 277 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Makhi Hughes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1401 Rush yards15 Rush TD265 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions176 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume92
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving40
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Temple (SP+ -20).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5200.52Wk 1 vs SE Louisiana: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma: -0.05 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Florida: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Rice: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Texas: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Charlotte: +0.28 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.52 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Navy: +0.17 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Memphis: -0.23 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Army: +0.06 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSE LouisianaW52-014594.21-0.02
2vsKansas StateL27-3414.1211286.1153700.18
3@OklahomaL19-349.519713.702131-0.05
4@LouisianaW41-334.8231667.210.46
5vsSouth FloridaW45-10-2.317613.621800.13
6@UABW71-20-11.3151197.9211500.48
8vsRiceW24-10-11.4271405.2112910.11
9@North TexasW45-37-4.5301956.511800.22
10@CharlotteW34-3-15.3271174.3221500.28
11vsTempleW52-6-20.3191538.120.52
12@NavyW35-03.522823.721300.17
14vsMemphisL24-349.69151.702260-0.23
15@ArmyL14-359.214664.7032200.06
20vsFloridaL8-3313.88293.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.3%
Passing plays
7.1%
Rushing plays
47.8%
Standard downs
34.8%
Passing downs
26.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.65 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.600−0.30
EPA per play · 2024 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.