Skip to content
Lincoln Pare

#7Lincoln Pare

RB·Texas State·20252.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Lincoln Pare is a Pass-Catching Back for Texas State. Lincoln's 2025 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 239 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lincoln Pare's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1129 Rush yards12 Rush TD211 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
37 Receptions311 Rec yards2 Rec TD8.4 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns13 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume76
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving69
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.12 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Eastern Michigan (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1201.12Wk 1 vs Eastern Michigan: +1.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UTSA: +0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona State: +0.34 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nicholls: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Arkansas State: +0.18 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Troy: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Marshall: -0.03 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs James Madison: -0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana: +0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Southern Miss: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UL Monroe: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs South Alabama: +0.15 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEastern MichiganW52-27-14.71216713.9112001.12
2@UTSAW43-363.721713.4131300.09
3@Arizona StateL15-343.913614.7043600.34
4vsNichollsW35-315644.311500.19
6@Arkansas StateL30-31-8.8211055.0223900.18
7vsTroyL41-48-4.8221135.131800.34
8@MarshallL37-40-4.514271.915440-0.03
10vsJames MadisonL20-5212.312403.30280-0.21
11@LouisianaL39-42-10.110898.9175000.55
12@Southern MissW41-14-7.1211185.611500.23
13vsUL MonroeW31-14-21.619764.0053710.23
14vsSouth AlabamaW49-26-12.720924.6044010.15
20vsRiceW41-10-14.8111069.61160

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.5%
Passing plays
10.1%
Rushing plays
38.7%
Standard downs
31.3%
Passing downs
14.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.250−0.34
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.