Skip to content
Kyle Trask

#11Kyle Trask

QB·Florida·2020201916.3 pts line value1st Round

Kyle Trask is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Florida. Kyle's 2020 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 486 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyle Trask's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Passing
301/437 Comp/Att4283 Pass yards43 Pass TD8 INT68.9% Comp %
Rushing
50 Rush yards3 Rush TD64 Carries0.8 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts32 Punt yards32.0 Yards/punt32 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat37
  • Consistency92
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency92th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Arkansas (SP+ 2).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Bo NixOregon0.72216.7390.0
Justin FieldsOhio State0.71317.0385.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8300.83Wk 4 vs Ole Miss: +0.71 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Carolina: +0.47 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: +0.44 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Missouri: +0.38 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia: +0.44 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arkansas: +0.83 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Vanderbilt: +0.60 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kentucky: +0.54 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tennessee: +0.51 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs LSU: +0.48 EPA/play15Wk 16 vs Alabama: +0.38 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
4@Ole MissW51-354.830/4241660200.71
5vsSouth CarolinaW38-24-2.421/29268412200.47
6@Texas A&ML38-4116.223/3231240400.44
9vsMissouriW41-17-1.021/36345414700.38
10vsGeorgiaW44-2819.130/4347441-500.44
11vsArkansasW63-351.623/2935660800.83
12@VanderbiltW38-17-16.826/3538330700.60
13vsKentuckyW34-102.221/2725630300.54
14@TennesseeW31-190.935/4943340-1000.51
15vsLSUL34-376.029/4747422-2820.48
16vsAlabamaL46-5228.326/4040830010.38
1vsOklahomaL20-5517.816/281580321.700

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.9%
Passing plays
95.6%
Rushing plays
15.1%
Standard downs
58.9%
Passing downs
70.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.80
Pass / Rush EPA
0.55 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.95+0.132020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Florida
8.5
212.0
2020Florida
16.3
347.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.