Skip to content
Kimani Vidal

#28Kimani Vidal

RB·Troy·20233.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Kimani Vidal is a Featured Back for Troy. Kimani's 2023 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 304 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kimani Vidal's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1662 Rush yards14 Rush TD296 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions201 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume95
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency63
  • Receiving23
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs App State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs Stephen F. Austin: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: -0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs James Madison: -0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Kentucky: +0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia State: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arkansas State: +0.57 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Army: +0.38 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Texas State: -0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Alabama: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UL Monroe: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Louisiana: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Southern Miss: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs App State: +0.61 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsStephen F. AustinW48-30252489.9025400.47
2@Kansas StateL13-4216.217834.90-0.08
3vsJames MadisonL14-1611.811272.50150-0.25
4vsWestern KentuckyW27-24-2.0261566.0245800.38
5@Georgia StateW28-7-6.823763.3121610.09
6vsArkansas StateW37-3-6.3282458.830.57
7@ArmyW19-0-4.0231165.001700.38
9@Texas StateW31-13-1.618432.40-0.15
10vsSouth AlabamaW28-105.1241255.212400.30
11@UL MonroeW45-14-21.615503.3044600.14
12vsLouisianaW31-240.4271124.111800.15
13@Southern MissW35-17-14.416694.310.10
14vsApp StateW49-233.8262339.050.61
20vsDukeL10-179.417794.60130

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.1%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
63.4%
Standard downs
40.0%
Passing downs
19.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.700−0.34
EPA per play · 2023 · 42 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.