Skip to content
Kewan Lacy

#5Kewan Lacy

RB·Ole Miss·20253.0 pts line value1st Round

Kewan Lacy is a Featured Back for Ole Miss. Kewan's 2025 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 333 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kewan Lacy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1567 Rush yards24 Rush TD306 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
29 Receptions177 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

7
Targets
3.4y
Avg depth
6.2y
After catch
57%
Catch rate

The ball travels 3.4 yards in the air on an average target 5.6 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.2 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
0% · 0y
short
3
67% · 7y
0
3
67% · 12y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency62
  • Receiving41
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs The Citadel.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kentucky: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulane: +0.14 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: -0.16 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Washington State: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia: +0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma: -0.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs The Citadel: +0.85 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +0.30 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Mississippi State: +0.09 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsGeorgia StateW63-7-24.5161086.830.45
2@KentuckyW30-231.8281384.911400.08
3vsArkansasW41-355.117442.6144000.15
4vsTulaneW45-106.318683.823300.14
5vsLSUW24-1910.323873.813210-0.16
7vsWashington StateW24-213.8241425.9021900.28
8@GeorgiaL35-4324.112312.6231000.10
9@OklahomaW34-2618.327782.922170-0.06
10vsSouth CarolinaW30-145.9241677.013700.14
11vsThe CitadelW49-011494.5311300.85
12vsFloridaW34-243.5312247.232500.30
14@Mississippi StateW38-194.1271435.3111500.09
20vsGeorgiaW39-3424.122984.522120
20vsMiamiL27-3120.7111039.41140
20vsTulaneW41-106.315875.81170

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.9%
Passing plays
6.9%
Rushing plays
54.7%
Standard downs
36.1%
Passing downs
16.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.11
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.950−0.26
EPA per play · 2025 · 15 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.