Skip to content
Hyleck Foster

#2Hyleck Foster

WR·Marshall·20150.5 pts line value1st Round

Hyleck Foster is a Versatile WR for Marshall. Hyleck's 2015 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 110 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hyleck Foster's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
453 Rush yards3 Rush TD100 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions96 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.6 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns18 KR yards0 KR TD10 Punt returns37 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume45
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.2200.815.4
Justin LynchNorthern Illinois0.2300.715.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2800.28Wk 1 vs Purdue: -0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio: -0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Norfolk State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 7 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.21 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs North Texas: +0.28 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Charlotte: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida International: +0.08 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: -0.07 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs UConn: -0.11 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsPurdueW41-31-7.43155.008-0.24
2@OhioL10-21-0.57334.7010-0.09
3vsNorfolk StateW45-711616.00160.10
5vsOld DominionW27-7-14.8
7@Florida AtlanticW33-17-9.80.21
8vsNorth TexasW30-13-25.00.28
9@CharlotteW34-10-21.72105.0060.15
10@Middle TennesseeL24-27-4.62147.0080.13
11vsFlorida InternationalW52-0-16.60.08
13@Western KentuckyL28-4910.8111.001-0.07
1vsUConnW16-10-6.3177.007-0.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.9%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
27.1%
Standard downs
18.9%
Passing downs
8.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.37
Pass / Rush EPA
0.02 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.330−0.29
EPA per play · 2015 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.