Skip to content
DJ Giddens

#31DJ Giddens

RB·Kansas State·202420232.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

DJ Giddens is a 2-year Featured Back for Kansas State. DJ's 2024 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 219 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So DJ Giddens's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1343 Rush yards7 Rush TD205 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
21 Receptions258 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume84
  • Explosiveness72
  • Consistency74
  • Receiving39
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.22 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6400.64Wk 1 vs UT Martin: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulane: +0.26 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona: +0.45 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs BYU: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: +0.64 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Colorado: +0.38 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs West Virginia: +0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kansas: +0.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Houston: -0.07 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona State: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Cincinnati: +0.56 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Iowa State: -0.09 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUT MartinW41-6131249.503600.35
2@TulaneW34-275.7191146.0046310.26
3vsArizonaW31-7-2.817865.110.45
4@BYUL9-3815.319934.900.13
5vsOklahoma StateW42-20-2.61518712.5112200.64
7@ColoradoW31-288.1251827.3023800.38
8@West VirginiaW45-182.119573.0215300.10
9vsKansasW29-274.9181025.7011500.03
10@HoustonL19-24-8.217502.915160-0.07
12vsArizona StateL14-249.4141339.501600.38
13vsCincinnatiW41-15-0.1151439.5233900.56
14@Iowa StateL21-2910.314725.10-0.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.5%
Passing plays
6.4%
Rushing plays
49.6%
Standard downs
32.0%
Passing downs
23.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.480−0.282024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Kansas State
2.3
54.2
2024Kansas State
2.3
55.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.