Skip to content
Devontae Booker

#23Devontae Booker

RB·Utah·201520142.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Devontae Booker is a 2-year Featured Back for Utah. Devontae's 2014 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 333 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Devontae Booker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1512 Rush yards10 Rush TD292 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
43 Receptions306 Rec yards2 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns57 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency37
  • Receiving60
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency37th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Idaho State.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Idaho State: +0.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Fresno State: +0.06 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Michigan: -0.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Washington State: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCLA: +0.18 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Oregon State: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs USC: -0.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona State: -0.01 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oregon: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Stanford: -0.14 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado: +0.17 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIdaho StateW56-1410787.8216100.95
2vsFresno StateW59-27-6.910676.700.06
4@MichiganW26-108.211343.10290-0.21
5vsWashington StateL27-28-1.7241787.412-400.13
6@UCLAW30-2817.7331564.7131500.18
8@Oregon StateW29-233.2322297.232-300.35
9vsUSCW24-2117.1261023.911170-0.06
10@Arizona StateL16-1913.5371463.90261-0.01
11vsOregonL27-5124.718653.60811010.14
12@StanfordW20-1721.417583.409410-0.14
13vsArizonaL10-427.6231426.204800.03
14@ColoradoW38-34-5.025953.8152200.17
1vsColorado StateW45-104.5261626.2142400.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
35.3%
Passing plays
11.7%
Rushing plays
54.5%
Standard downs
40.3%
Passing downs
24.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.322015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Utah
2.1
61.5
2015Utah
1.9
58.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.