Skip to content
Deshaun Watson

#4Deshaun Watson

QB·Clemson·2016201514.7 pts line value1st Round

Deshaun Watson is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Clemson. Deshaun's 2016 season ranks in the 57th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 716 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Deshaun Watson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
387/578 Comp/Att4593 Pass yards41 Pass TD17 INT67.0% Comp %
Rushing
629 Rush yards9 Rush TD165 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts38 Punt yards38.0 Yards/punt38 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency57
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat36
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)57th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.19 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Syracuse (SP+ -3).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Patrick MahomesTexas Tech0.50315.0378.4
Lamar JacksonLouisville0.54316.1387.6
Drake MayeNorth Carolina0.52313.0369.6
Clayton TuneHouston0.54213.9353.3
Dak PrescottMississippi State0.51413.6336.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Auburn: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Troy: +0.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Carolina State: +0.79 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Tech: +0.22 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisville: +0.19 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boston College: +0.46 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs NC State: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Florida State: +0.27 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Syracuse: +0.79 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Pittsburgh: +0.33 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wake Forest: +0.32 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Carolina: +0.75 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Virginia Tech: +0.53 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.32 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.32 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@AuburnW19-1315.319/342481163.32100.13
2vsTroyW30-241.127/532923229.85500.12
3vsSouth Carolina StateW59-012/151523093.7800.79
4@Georgia TechW26-77.832/483042161.43600.22
5vsLouisvilleW42-3622.920/313065361.69100.19
6@Boston CollegeW56-10-1.615/252704085.73300.46
7vsNC StateW24-179.439/523782187.43510.10
9@Florida StateW37-3424.027/433782258.35200.27
10vsSyracuseW54-0-2.713/161692092.43910.79
11vsPittsburghL42-4313.152/705803382.2800.33
12@Wake ForestW35-13-0.623/332021077.54720.32
13vsSouth CarolinaW56-7-4.026/323476192.91900.75
14vsVirginia TechW42-3515.223/342883180.58520.53
1vsOhio StateW31-022.423/362591266.55720.32
1vsAlabamaW35-3131.736/564203063.34310.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.9%
Passing plays
91.5%
Rushing plays
26.6%
Standard downs
55.5%
Passing downs
71.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.870−0.022016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 30 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Clemson
16.2
418.1
2016Clemson
14.7
410.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.