Skip to content
Patrick Mahomes

#5Patrick Mahomes

QB·Texas Tech·2016201515.0 pts line value1st Round

Patrick Mahomes is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Texas Tech. Patrick's 2015 season ranks in the 55th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 679 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Patrick Mahomes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
364/573 Comp/Att4653 Pass yards36 Pass TD15 INT63.5% Comp %
Rushing
456 Rush yards10 Rush TD131 Carries3.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency55
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)55th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.36 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.78 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UTEP (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Clayton TuneHouston0.54213.9353.3
Lamar JacksonLouisville0.54316.1387.6
Dak PrescottMississippi State0.51413.6336.6
Deshaun WatsonClemson0.58416.2418.1
Sam EhlingerTexas0.53513.2349.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7800.78Wk 1 vs Sam Houston: +0.51 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UTEP: +0.78 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +0.65 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs TCU: +0.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Baylor: +0.50 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.61 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas: +0.12 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma: +0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs West Virginia: +0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas State: +0.45 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Texas: +0.29 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs LSU: +0.12 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSam HoustonW59-4533/534254188.54800.51
2vsUTEPW69-20-19.518/333614093.22320.78
3@ArkansasW35-2419.226/302431290.75820.65
4vsTCUL52-5519.025/453922084.53610.43
5vsBaylorL35-6319.532/504153290.53910.50
6vsIowa StateW66-31-0.333/464285092.3100.61
7@KansasW30-20-21.329/503541157.42900.12
8@OklahomaL27-6322.726/402331429.44710.10
9vsOklahoma StateL53-709.938/554804276.04610.22
10@West VirginiaL26-3112.921/341963152.97300.14
11vsKansas StateW59-442.633/423843073.71410.45
13@TexasW48-453.722/393721167.47010.29
1vsLSUL27-5619.728/563704143.3-2800.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
64.2%
Passing plays
92.8%
Rushing plays
25.2%
Standard downs
58.2%
Passing downs
76.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.69
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.56

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.020−0.232016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Texas Tech
15.0
378.4
2016Texas Tech
17.5
390.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.