Skip to content
Lamar Jackson

#8Lamar Jackson

QB·Louisville·2017201616.1 pts line value1st Round

Lamar Jackson is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Louisville. Lamar's 2016 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 583 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lamar Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
230/409 Comp/Att3543 Pass yards30 Pass TD9 INT56.2% Comp %
Rushing
1571 Rush yards21 Rush TD260 Carries6.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch83
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Charlotte (SP+ -21).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jared GoffCalifornia0.61015.7341.0
Kyle TraskFlorida0.64816.3347.5
Chad KellyOle Miss0.63517.5370.2
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7
Brandon DoughtyWestern Kentucky0.62017.8379.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9800.98Wk 1 vs Charlotte: +0.98 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.59 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida State: +0.57 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Marshall: +0.49 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Clemson: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Duke: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs NC State: +0.50 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia: +0.52 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Boston College: +0.93 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Houston: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kentucky: +0.35 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs LSU: -0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsCharlotteW70-14-20.917/232866098.511920.98
2@SyracuseW62-28-2.720/394111195.819940.59
3vsFlorida StateW63-2024.013/202161194.514640.57
4@MarshallW59-28-12.724/444175181.06220.49
5@ClemsonL36-4228.727/442951171.016220.28
7vsDukeW24-14-2.813/261811072.514410.32
8vsNC StateW54-139.420/343553090.17610.50
9@VirginiaW32-25-3.824/413614181.58800.52
10@Boston CollegeW52-7-1.612/172314199.818530.93
11vsWake ForestW44-12-0.614/261451048.815300.14
12@HoustonL10-3610.120/432111020.33300.04
13vsKentuckyL38-41-2.616/252812376.417120.35
1vsLSUL9-2925.310/27153007.9330-0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
68.2%
Passing plays
94.1%
Rushing plays
45.3%
Standard downs
65.5%
Passing downs
74.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.100−0.352017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Louisville
16.1
387.6
2017Louisville
16.8
384.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.