Skip to content
Tre Stewart

#28Tre Stewart

RB·Jacksonville State·20243.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Tre Stewart is a Featured Back for Jacksonville State. Tre's 2024 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 273 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tre Stewart's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1636 Rush yards25 Rush TD279 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions233 Rec yards1 Rec TD13.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency59
  • Receiving33
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.12 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1201.12Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: +1.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisville: -0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.34 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Miss: +0.03 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Kennesaw State: +0.49 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs New Mexico State: +0.43 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.49 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Liberty: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida International: +0.37 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Sam Houston: -0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Kentucky: +0.23 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Western Kentucky: +0.60 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCoastal CarolinaL27-55-6.946215.5111701.12
2@LouisvilleL14-4913.6492.30-0.30
3@Eastern MichiganL34-37-13.317533.11110-0.34
4vsSouthern MissW44-7-25.616966.020.03
6@Kennesaw StateW63-24-25.1241345.640.49
7vsNew Mexico StateW54-13-19.0211185.6213210.43
9vsMiddle TennesseeW42-20-24.42121010.0122400.49
10@LibertyW31-210.2272328.640.47
11@Louisiana TechW44-37-11.6341664.9211500.16
12vsFlorida InternationalW34-31-12.1221366.2232000.37
13vsSam HoustonW21-11-6.927993.70170-0.12
14@Western KentuckyL17-19-2.220854.3123000.23
15vsWestern KentuckyW52-12-2.2272017.4335400.60
20vsOhioL27-302.315352.322330

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.2%
Passing plays
5.6%
Rushing plays
44.7%
Standard downs
37.6%
Passing downs
14.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.93 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.260−0.48
EPA per play · 2024 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.