Skip to content
Synjyn Days

#10Synjyn Days

RB·Georgia Tech·20143.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Synjyn Days is a Explosive Back for Georgia Tech. Synjyn's 2014 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 161 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Synjyn Days's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
924 Rush yards9 Rush TD157 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions33 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume46
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency14
  • Receiving21
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency14th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.25 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs North Carolina (SP+ 0).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs Wofford: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulane: -0.11 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: -0.49 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Miami: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Duke: -0.94 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs North Carolina: +0.74 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Virginia: +0.37 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs NC State: +0.20 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Clemson: -0.09 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.28 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Florida State: +0.39 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: +0.53 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWoffordW38-195234.610.35
2@TulaneW38-21-15.0133.00-0.11
3vsGeorgia SouthernW42-38-2.42126.000.27
4@Virginia TechW27-247.8166.00-0.49
6vsMiamiW28-1713.93196.300.31
7vsDukeL25-317.0111.00-0.94
8@North CarolinaL43-480.03258.300.74
9@PittsburghW56-2814.1221105.000.22
10vsVirginiaW35-104.0241476.1111710.37
11@NC StateW56-238.1191578.311600.20
12vsClemsonW28-618.120894.40-0.09
14@GeorgiaW30-2427.616945.900.28
15vsFlorida StateL35-3728.519673.5311000.39
1vsMississippi StateW49-3422.2211718.130.53

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.1%
Passing plays
1.9%
Rushing plays
20.1%
Standard downs
18.3%
Passing downs
9.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.910−1.11
EPA per play · 2014 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.