Skip to content
Reggie Gallaspy II
Reggie Gallaspy II

#25Reggie Gallaspy II

RB·NC State·20182.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Reggie Gallaspy II is a Committee Back for NC State. Reggie's 2018 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 217 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Reggie Gallaspy II's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1018 Rush yards16 Rush TD217 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
6 Receptions27 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume70
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency30
  • Receiving15
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency30th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.13 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.47 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs East Carolina (SP+ -15).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4700.47Wk 1 vs James Madison: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: -0.30 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Marshall: -0.07 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boston College: +0.19 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Clemson: +0.19 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Syracuse: -0.05 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Florida State: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: -0.32 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs East Carolina: +0.47 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.36 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsJames MadisonW24-1317684.010.02
2vsGeorgia StateW41-7-20.411242.21-0.30
4@MarshallW37-201.022813.72-0.07
5vsVirginiaW35-217.114473.411500.20
6vsBoston CollegeW28-232.4251044.220.19
8@ClemsonL7-4129.79596.611800.19
9@SyracuseL41-517.519653.41100-0.05
10vsFlorida StateW47-281.4211065.000.19
11vsWake ForestL23-273.614362.60-0.32
13@North CarolinaW34-28-2.5271294.851000.38
14vsEast CarolinaW58-3-14.9242209.221200.47
1vsTexas A&ML13-5221.614795.6011200.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.5%
Passing plays
2.0%
Rushing plays
49.1%
Standard downs
28.7%
Passing downs
14.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.04
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.550−0.40
EPA per play · 2018 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.