Skip to content
Reggie Corbin

#2Reggie Corbin

RB·Illinois·20183.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Reggie Corbin is a Explosive Back for Illinois. Reggie's 2018 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 143 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Reggie Corbin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1085 Rush yards9 Rush TD128 Carries8.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions176 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume51
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency45
  • Receiving59
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (80th percentile).
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.00 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Minnesota (SP+ 6).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Devon JohnsonMarshall0.5206.0108.2
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0001.00Wk 1 vs Kent State: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Illinois: +0.36 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Florida: +0.19 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Penn State: +0.17 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Rutgers: +0.44 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Purdue: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wisconsin: -0.12 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Maryland: +0.41 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Minnesota: +1.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Nebraska: +0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Iowa: -0.57 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northwestern: -0.02 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsKent StateW31-24-20.410797.921400.50
2vsWestern IllinoisW34-1415634.2111400.36
3vsSouth FloridaL19-25-1.212988.203700.19
4vsPenn StateL24-6319.011877.9121300.17
6@RutgersW38-17-12.31113712.510.44
7vsPurdueL7-466.56203.3015200.01
8@WisconsinL20-4915.5910011.11120-0.12
9@MarylandL33-633.0181558.6112500.41
10vsMinnesotaW55-316.31321316.421.00
11@NebraskaL35-545.49596.6013400.07
12vsIowaL0-6313.31-4-4.00130-0.57
13@NorthwesternL16-241.913786.004220-0.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.7%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
27.5%
Standard downs
20.8%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.58
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.160−0.73
EPA per play · 2018 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.