Skip to content
Raheim Sanders

#5Raheim Sanders

RB·Arkansas·202420221.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Raheim Sanders is a 2-year Featured Back for Arkansas. Raheim's 2022 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 245 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Raheim Sanders's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1443 Rush yards10 Rush TD222 Carries6.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions271 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume74
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency55
  • Receiving49
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs BYU (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5500.55Wk 1 vs Cincinnati: -0.11 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri State: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas A&M: -0.02 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Alabama: +0.06 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Mississippi State: +0.28 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs BYU: +0.55 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Auburn: +0.42 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Liberty: -0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs LSU: -0.23 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ole Miss: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Kansas: -0.09 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCincinnatiW31-2413.1201175.903120-0.11
2vsSouth CarolinaW44-3012.7241566.5233000.40
3vsMissouri StateW38-27221677.6127510.35
4vsTexas A&ML21-239.117684.00-0.02
5vsAlabamaL26-4930.3221014.6121900.06
6@Mississippi StateL17-4015.420864.3144900.28
7@BYUW52-35-1.41517511.721400.55
9@AuburnW41-275.11617110.701600.42
10vsLibertyL19-21-1.517603.502250-0.04
11vsLSUL10-1316.212463.80200-0.23
12vsOle MissW42-2716.2242329.7352900.41
13@MissouriL27-298.110474.7032210.12
1vsKansasW55-532.93175.70-0.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
25.8%
Passing plays
7.0%
Rushing plays
38.1%
Standard downs
28.3%
Passing downs
19.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.55 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.352024
EPA per play · 2022 — 2024 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Arkansas
1.9
48.3
2024South Carolina
2.5
56.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.