Skip to content
Nick Fitzgerald

#7Nick Fitzgerald

QB·Mississippi State·201820164.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Nick Fitzgerald is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Mississippi State. Nick's 2018 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 469 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nick Fitzgerald's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
145/281 Comp/Att1772 Pass yards16 Pass TD9 INT51.6% Comp %
Rushing
1121 Rush yards13 Rush TD221 Carries5.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat92
  • Consistency55
  • Clutch60
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.12 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Louisiana (SP+ -7).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 2 vs Kansas State: +0.34 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana: +0.79 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Kentucky: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida: -0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Auburn: +0.22 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs LSU: -0.26 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas A&M: +0.53 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.51 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Alabama: -0.25 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arkansas: +0.62 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ole Miss: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Iowa: -0.08 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@Kansas StateW31-10-0.511/271542115900.34
3vsLouisianaW56-10-6.914/212432010740.79
4@KentuckyL7-2813.116/3215001201-0.01
5vsFloridaL6-1323.011/269800320-0.09
6vsAuburnW23-923.69/17690119520.22
8@LSUL3-1924.28/2459041310-0.26
9vsTexas A&MW28-1321.614/22241208820.53
10vsLouisiana TechW45-3-6.917/282434010700.51
11@AlabamaL0-2436.311/2012500-230-0.25
12vsArkansasW52-64.59/14127408510.62
13@Ole MissW35-39.811/181111011720.38
1vsIowaL22-2713.314/32152121031-0.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
64.4%
Passing plays
97.4%
Rushing plays
43.2%
Standard downs
59.2%
Passing downs
77.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
0.06 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.280−0.442018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Mississippi State
7.4
230.9
2018Mississippi State
4.5
199.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.