Skip to content
Marquise Williams
Marquise Williams

#12Marquise Williams

QB·North Carolina·201520148.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Marquise Williams is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for North Carolina. Marquise's 2015 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 492 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marquise Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
219/357 Comp/Att3072 Pass yards24 Pass TD10 INT61.3% Comp %
Rushing
948 Rush yards13 Rush TD158 Carries6.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency79
  • Clutch85
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Duke (SP+ 3).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 1 vs South Carolina: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina A&T: +0.81 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Illinois: +0.51 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Delaware: +0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia Tech: +0.37 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Wake Forest: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Virginia: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: +0.59 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.87 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Miami: +0.46 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia Tech: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Clemson: +0.14 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Baylor: +0.34 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouth CarolinaL13-173.419/312321315.190-0.02
2vsNorth Carolina A&TW53-1415/202112098.95310.81
3vsIllinoisW48-142.717/242033186.410500.51
4vsDelawareW41-146/12650060.33110.08
5@Georgia TechW38-319.013/241340095.314820.37
7vsWake ForestW50-14-4.514/202823285.65910.68
8vsVirginiaW26-131.421/262260165.87100.26
9@PittsburghW26-1911.114/232702087.75200.59
10vsDukeW66-313.423/354944092.83010.87
11vsMiamiW59-2111.012/171091073.410130.46
12@Virginia TechW30-2711.413/262051043.37410.23
13@NC StateW45-349.619/301741164.45300.12
14vsClemsonL37-4524.011/332243127.08110.14
1vsBaylorL38-4919.522/362433183.38120.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.6%
Passing plays
87.7%
Rushing plays
27.2%
Standard downs
49.8%
Passing downs
63.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.970−0.232015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014North Carolina
7.5
256.6
2015North Carolina
8.3
240.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.