Skip to content
Marcus McMaryion
Marcus McMaryion

#6Marcus McMaryion

QB·Fresno State·20188.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Marcus McMaryion is a Dual-Threat QB for Fresno State. Marcus's 2018 season ranks in the 55th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 465 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcus McMaryion's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
293/427 Comp/Att3628 Pass yards25 Pass TD5 INT68.6% Comp %
Rushing
296 Rush yards8 Rush TD71 Carries4.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency55
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch47
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)55th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Toledo (SP+ 2).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 1 vs Idaho: +0.25 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Minnesota: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCLA: +0.54 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Toledo: +0.87 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Nevada: +0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wyoming: +0.61 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: +0.64 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Hawai'i: +0.67 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UNLV: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boise State: +0.20 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs San Diego State: +0.36 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San José State: +0.57 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: +0.08 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Arizona State: +0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsIdahoW79-1319/2620700400.25
2@MinnesotaL14-216.323/32205211500.28
3@UCLAW38-14-0.422/33270101640.54
5vsToledoW49-272.024/31368411510.87
6@NevadaW21-3-0.520/2824120-500.24
7vsWyomingW27-31.922/32287205320.61
8@New MexicoW38-7-9.520/30280301200.64
9vsHawai'iW50-20-10.421/3128440800.67
10@UNLVW48-3-11.126/35274213900.47
11@Boise StateL17-2412.224/35283101200.20
12vsSan Diego StateW23-146.017/24267101600.36
13vsSan José StateW31-13-17.120/29317203000.57
14@Boise StateW19-1612.220/32170104000.08
1vsArizona StateW31-205.015/29175024110.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.1%
Passing plays
97.1%
Rushing plays
13.0%
Standard downs
43.5%
Passing downs
75.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.40
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.57

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.960−0.04
EPA per play · 2018 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.