Skip to content
Kurtis Rourke

#9Kurtis Rourke

Kurtis Rourke is a Dual-Threat QB for Ohio. Kurtis's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 347 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kurtis Rourke's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
195/307 Comp/Att2207 Pass yards11 Pass TD5 INT63.5% Comp %
Rushing
219 Rush yards4 Rush TD67 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat89
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch91
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.97 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9700.97Wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.36 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Bowling Green: +0.97 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Kent State: +0.50 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Western Michigan: +0.33 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Miami (OH): +0.39 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Buffalo: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Central Michigan: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Akron: +0.54 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0@San Diego StateL13-20-10.38/10750072.0-100
2@Florida AtlanticW17-10-9.418/292031252.62600.36
3vsIowa StateW10-77.516/321351077.65800.10
4@Bowling GreenW38-7-7.814/161963098.33300.97
6vsKent StateW42-17-26.320/323003073.22610.50
7@Northern IllinoisL13-23-7.522/361590332.01810.23
8vsWestern MichiganW20-17-15.924/392751069.43300.33
9vsMiami (OH)L16-302.825/393131044.91100.39
11@BuffaloW20-10-15.214/211210035.5100.22
12vsCentral MichiganW34-20-19.115/232220055.11310.39
13@AkronW25-14-21.619/302081057.61010.54

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.1%
Passing plays
84.1%
Rushing plays
14.7%
Standard downs
42.9%
Passing downs
60.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.320−0.30
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.